Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Brazil/archive1

List of World Heritage Sites in Brazil

Featured list candidates/List of World Heritage Sites in Brazil/archive1

Nominator(s): Tone 19:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brazil has 24 WHS and 22 tentative sites. Some sites are very fresh and there's plenty of nature. Since the list for Argentina was my sole running nomination and just got promoted, I am adding a new one. Standard style. Tone 19:09, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, Egypt is running and is seeing support, somehow I forgot about that nomination. Anyway, nothing changes. Tone 06:57, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

MPGuy2824

"of the sugarcane industry".
For "Ruins of Sao Miguel das Missoes (Brazil)" it would to add some info about the only site in Brazil along with the general info about all five missions.
"centre of the sugar industry".
"the Cathedral Basilica of Salvador, the Church and Convent of São Francisco, Salvador, and the Church of the Third Order of Mount Carmel."
"The church, which is from the second half of the 18th century, is"
" in the Italian-inspired Rococo style."
is there a good wikilink for "ceramic-farmer societies"
"the beach with a paving of hewn stones "
"The park is located on the coast of the Maranhão State. It comprises a vast expanse of sandy dunes with temporary and permanent lagoons." -MPGuy2824 (talk) 09:08, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Fixed, thanks! As for the link, the most appropriate seems to be the Formative stage, but not ideal and may look like an Easter egg. Old-world equivalent would be Neolithic but that clearly does not apply to Brazil. Tone 18:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
...continuing
"only atoll in the South Atlantic".

"The site was inscribed to the World Heritage List as the Brazilian Atlantic Islands"
Use either "inscribed on" or "added to".

Also, if this is already inscribed, then what is the change? -MPGuy2824 (talk) 06:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. This is one of the cases where a tentative site gets promoted in another nomination and they forgot to do the cleanup of the list ;) Happens every now and then. Tone 10:18, 18 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support -MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:33, 19 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Alavense

I'd suggest linking New World.
Same for Christian art.
I know it's in the source, but I feel as if most spectacular is a bit of a vague term.
Link hunter-gatherer.
azulejo already implies that it's ceramic, so azulejo ceramic tiles sounds a bit weird.
which were in past connected - Maybe "in the past"?
one of the worlds
various adaptation - I feel "adaptations" would be better?
Given that the Oxford comma is used throughout the text, it would be better to include it for the Provincial Palace, the Church and Convent of Santa Cruz (pictured) and the Misericórdia Hospital and Church as well.
the latter two now being used as a museum and an architecture reference centre - Respectively? If so, I'd suggest adding it.
The cultural landscape or the region
by the team of architects - Maybe "by a team of architects featuring..."?
for grazing and cultivation which presents - A comma is missing.
which used to span over all north-east Brazil but has since shrunk due to human activity - Either specify when it used to span all over the north-east or remove the "since".
Parts of the ceiling has
Immediately after that, the same problem with "since" once more.
Ought Cerrado to be italicized?
accelerated development of São Paulo - "the development"
Construction of the track - "The construction"
due to the demanding geography - Is the geography what's demanding? Or is it maybe the orography?
The surroundings of the dam are interesting on itself - On themselves, on their own?
the native Kiriri people whose - A comma is missing.
a physician and epidemiologist Oswaldo Cruz - "The"?

That's what I saw. Nice work, Tone. Kind regards, Alavense (talk) 06:50, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tone: Just following up about the above concerns. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On it soon. Yesterday I sorted the comments for Egypt, Brazil is next :) Tone 16:59, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just noting that Tone has been offline the last 4 days, but I do expect that the concerns will be addressed when they're back online. Nomination isn't particularly old, so I'm not going to ping or rush them yet. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:56, 10 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I plan to work on this today and tomorrow. Tone 07:01, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Alavense: Alright, done! Huh, that took me some time to fix, sorry. Linking Christian art sounds a bit vague to me, the rest I mostly agree with and I've fixed. Thanks again for checking! Tone 19:29, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey man im josh

Source review: Passed

Reliable enough for the information being cited
Consistent date formatting
Consistent and proper reference formatting
Appropriate wikilinks where applicable
Spot checks on 15 sources match what they are being cited for

Support, good stuff Tone. Hey man im josh (talk) 15:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]