Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Mad Max: Fury Road/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 30 May 2016 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Mad Max: Fury Road (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Mad Max: Fury Road was a welcome surprise in 2015. Stuck in development hell for many years, upon release it received widespread critical acclaim and numerous accolades which are listed here. As always, I welcome all the helpful, constructive comments to improve the list. Cowlibob (talk) 17:39, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Yashthepunisher (talk) 02:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from Yashthepunisher
That's it from me. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support this nomination. Good luck. Yashthepunisher (talk) 02:53, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Informative and well referenced list. Great work!
- P.S. I'm also having an FLC with this nomination. — Simon (talk) 08:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support One of the best films of all time, Mad Max: Fury Road's acolades list is well-written and very informative. It definitely deserves that bronze star. Well done.Krish | Talk 15:27, 2 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Just some "stop-by" comments:
Access dates for a lot of references are missing e.g. 15, 17.- A lot of whitespaces. I have fixed one. You can use this script to fix the rest.
Titles for the categories of Dorian Awards are different in the provided source. FrB.TG (talk) 20:11, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @FrB.TG: Thanks for the comments. I think I've sorted them. Cowlibob (talk) 10:08, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No reference supports the film's nods at the Golden Trailer Awards.
- @FrB.TG: I've added references, it was confusing as it was nominated at both the 2015 and 2016 Golden Trailer Awards. Cowlibob (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - well referenced & extensive list. Dan arndt (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Krimuk90
Solid list. Just a few issues:
- "Tom Hardy stars as the title character Max Rockatansky who helps rebel soldier Imperator Furiosa played by Charlize Theron rescue five women from the imprisonment of despotic leader Immortan Joe (Hugh Keays-Byrne)". Commas missing.
- Commas missing in the third paragraph before the use of the word "including"
- "It went on to win the most awards at the ceremony with six" Commas missing, again.
- An external links section will help. Krimuk|90 (talk) 09:00, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Krimuk90: Thanks for the comments. I think I've sorted most of them. I'm not sure which external links would be appropriate, any suggestions? Cowlibob (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the IMDB one should do, to be consistent with most other award lists. Krimuk|90 (talk) 03:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Krimuk90: IMDb link has been added by Yash. Cowlibob (talk) 18:01, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the IMDB one should do, to be consistent with most other award lists. Krimuk|90 (talk) 03:53, 18 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Krimuk90: Thanks for the comments. I think I've sorted most of them. I'm not sure which external links would be appropriate, any suggestions? Cowlibob (talk) 18:28, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Support after these tweaks. Krimuk|90 (talk) 01:33, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – References are appropriately formatted, just some minor issues:
- Missing date of publication for Ref 42
- Ref 53 needs author and publication date
- Ref 60 and 85 needs author's name
- Ref 63 needs retrival date
- Spotchecked a few sources, (6, 15, 16, 17, 28, 40, 49, 50, 61, 86), couldn't spot any cases of close paraphrasing or misleading info.
- Not an expert when it comes to image licenses; only one is used in the article, but there's a 'Personality rights warning'. Not sure how this affects the FL criteria. Lemonade51 (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lemonade51: Thanks for the source review. Let me know if more is required. Cowlibob (talk) 18:34, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.