Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 22:04:23 15 December 2019 (UTC) [1].
List of accolades received by Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Cowlibob (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Spider-Man: Into the Spider-Verse is a 2018 animated film from Sony Pictures Animation. It received a number of accolades including the Best Animated Film Oscar. I have gone through the article, added missing awards and references. Reworded the lead. I welcome any constructive comments on how to make it better. Cowlibob (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support Comments from Aoba47
edit
Everything looks really good with the list. I am only looking through the prose and the table as I will leave the sources to whoever does the source review. I just have a quick question about the "Outstanding Animated Character in an Animated Feature" category for the Visual Effects Society. I am a little confused on why Miles Morales is in italics. The wikilink goes to the character, and characters are not presented in italics. I was wondering why the italics were used in this instance? I have admittedly not seen this film (I am not much a comic book film fan myself) so apologies if this is rather obvious, but it is the only thing that really caught my eye while reading through the list. Once this question is addressed, I will be more than happy to support. Aoba47 (talk) 05:02, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Aoba47 Thanks for your review. I've changed them to quotation marks, there was no reason for Miles Morales or Graphic New York City to be italicised. Cowlibob (talk) 12:42, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing this. Why is a character's name put in quotation marks? Is the name of a section of the film or something like? Aoba47 (talk) 03:43, 10 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aoba47: It was just to highlight that the award was for their animation work for that particular character, and for that particular environment rather than the whole film. Cowlibob (talk) 09:18, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the clarification, but I do not think Miles Morales or Graphic New York City should be in italics or quotation marks. I think they should just be represented as Miles Morales or Graphic New York City. Aoba47 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aoba47: Changed. Cowlibob (talk) 11:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing this. I support the nomination for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 18:41, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @Aoba47: Changed. Cowlibob (talk) 11:01, 12 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the clarification, but I do not think Miles Morales or Graphic New York City should be in italics or quotation marks. I think they should just be represented as Miles Morales or Graphic New York City. Aoba47 (talk) 19:40, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- "many of them in Best Animated Feature category" - I think this should be "categories", as it refers to multiple awards. If you are sure it should be shown in the singular then it is missing the word "the"
- Sort order on the Result column is Won/Runner-up/Nominated/4th place/2nd place. As 2nd place is the same as runner-up, surely they should sort together? I would also suggest that 4th place should sort before merely being nominated
- That's it from me - good work! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 20:43, 9 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: Thanks for your review. I've changed the line to add "the" as it was particularly for that category. I've changed the 2nd place to Runner-up and the 4th place to nomination as that awarding body doesn't specifically highlight a 4th, 5th etc place as notable. This should hopefully fix the sorting order. Cowlibob (talk) 09:21, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 10:38, 11 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Support – Loved the movie and love the list. Great job to you :-) – zmbro (talk) 04:01, 27 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – The reliability and formatting of the references both look fine, and the link-checker tool reveals no issues. Spot-checks of refs 28, 35, and 47 showed no problems either. The source review has been passed. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 22:04, 15 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.