Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of accolades received by Titanic/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of accolades received by Titanic (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): GagaNutellatalk 03:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
I don't need to say that Titanic is one the greatest productions and had one of the biggest box office in film history. After a hard work, especially finding reliable sources (this was really difficult), and major changes, I am very happy and proud to nominate this list, which I believe deserves to have the FL status. GagaNutellatalk 03:59, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from User:ChrisTheDude
|
---|
|
Support - apologies for forgetting to return -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:29, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 22:54, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
To make it easier to track what's left, I'll put my replies here.
— RunningTiger123 (talk) 02:52, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support – the table is now sorting correctly, and it was quite a pain; I fully sympathize with your struggles now. (Wikipedia's auto-sorting features were trying to be helpful but ultimately caused more problems in this case. I even had to put in a "wrong" date to get everything to sort correctly... definitely not fun.) Thanks for sticking with the nomination through all of my comments! RunningTiger123 (talk) 04:26, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @RunningTiger123: your review was extremely important, thanks for helping me with that. GagaNutellatalk 01:33, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from User:SNUGGUMS
|
---|
Give me a ping after you go through these. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:35, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
|
You still should add Juno Award nominations to prose (Canadian equivalent of Grammys in US), but the improvements so far are enough for me to extend my support. Good work here! SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 03:26, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @SNUGGUMS: thank you so much for your support! I have added about it. GagaNutellatalk 02:11, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Source review – Pass
editWill do soon. Aza24 (talk) 22:26, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Formatting
- You might want to add url-access=limited to the NYT ref, as you have a subscription marking on the Rolling stones ref
Done
- LA times could be marked with as needing a subscription as well
- Why? I have free acess here. GagaNutellatalk 21:44, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Hmmm I don't, but not a huge issue. Aza24 (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- It must depend on the country, so I added now. GagaNutellatalk 23:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- ref 75 missing author
Done
- Reliability
- My reliabillity script has PR Newswire (ref 21) as a generally unreliable source. Is there a better ref for this information available?
- Sorry, I can't find anything better, but as it's just an award list and not something more complex, I believe that's okay in this case. The award is very old, so it's hard to find something on the internet from that time. GagaNutellatalk 21:44, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- No worries, I had a feeling this might be the case, just thought I'd check. Aza24 (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- seems fine otherwise
- Verifiability
- recommendation: add "trans-title=" to non-english sources
Done
- recommend using the archive bot on the links
Done
- perhaps add a page number(s) for ref 70?
Done I added the page number to all PDF references. GagaNutellatalk 21:44, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- ref 64 says "Your connection is not private" and is not opening up for me Aza24 (talk) 22:47, 5 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Done
- @Aza24: thanks for your review. What about now? GagaNutellatalk 21:44, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks great, pass for source review. Aza24 (talk) 23:33, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Amazing, Aza24! Thank you for this review. GagaNutellatalk 23:38, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 22:57, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.