Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of avisos of Germany/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:26, 19 December 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]

List of avisos of Germany

edit

List of avisos of Germany (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox

This list comprises all of the avisos built by the German fleets, beginning with the Prussian in the 1840s and ending with one such vessel for the Nazis in the 1930s. The list is the capstone to this topic. The list passed a Milhist A-class review earlier this year, so hopefully it shouldn't need much work. Thanks to all who take the time to help me iron out any remaining issues. Parsecboy (talk) 20:13, 17 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by Dank

  • Good to see you at FLC again, Nate.
  • Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
  • FLC criteria:
  • 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding in the tables seems fine.
  • 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
  • 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
  • 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review).
  • 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
  • 4. It is navigable.
  • 5. It meets style requirements. You make excellent use of images (but that's about all I'm qualified to say).
  • 6. It is stable.
  • Support and well done. - Dank (push to talk) 02:45, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Your edits look good to me, thanks Dan! Parsecboy (talk) 14:07, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Source review - Pass

edit

Some small things:

Comments Support from Hog Farm

edit

I'll take a look soon. Hog Farm Bacon 22:21, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • At least to me, it seems more accurate for the Nix class to give the dates sold to Britain in the table for the end of service date, as the focus is on the usage in the navies of the various German states in this article. If this change is made, the same thing applies with the latter Grille
    • That's a fair point
  • "She sortied twice more by early May, but on both occasions encountered far superior Danish forces and withdrew without attacking" - Just checking in to make sure that by is necessarily the word that conveys the right context here, as by and in would have different connotations here.
    • The two operations were on 24 April and 6 May, so "by" is correct
  • "she was the first steam ship to use screw propellers rather than the paddle wheels of earlier" - A bit nitpicky, but this implies multiple screw propellors, while the table states that the ship had only one.
    • Fixed
  • "With Grille serving as a yacht in the 1850s, the navy decided it needed another aviso to serve as a flagship for the gunboat flotillas defending the country's Baltic coast." - Specify that it's still the Prussians at this point.
    • Done
  • "Falke was originally built as a speculative project by her British constructors, who intended to sell the vessel to the Confederate States Navy for use as a blockade runner during the American Civil War" - Just checking in to see what the sources explicitly say. A number of ACW blockade runners were actually privately owned, so just want to make sure that the CSN is explicitly stated, not just assumed.
    • Hildebrand et. al. say (in German) the ship was built "on speculation for the Confederate States of America, but was not taken over."
  • "Greif was not a successful warship" - Can it be briefly stated why?
    • The sources aren't clear on this one, unlike some of the others (like the Meteors).

Willing to discuss any of these, and retract if need be. Hog Farm Bacon 00:55, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Hog Farm. Parsecboy (talk) 10:49, 10 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
  • "The 1880s saw a significant aviso construction program that included the two Blitz-class avisos, Greif, the two Wacht-class avisos, and the two Meteor-class avisos" - I'd be tempted to lose the "the" before each class, because it kinda implies that you are referring back to vessels previously mentioned, which isn't the case. Does that make sense?
    • That works for me
  • "Hela was, herself, sunk" - don't think those commas are needed personally
    • Removed
  • "Greif was designed at a time where torpedoes had become" => "Greif was designed at a time when torpedoes had become"
    • Fixed
  • That's all I've got. Great work and an interesting read on a topic I know little about -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:55, 6 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:20, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting; sorry for the delay. --PresN 20:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_avisos_of_Germany/archive1&oldid=996999096"