Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Margaret/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 16 January 2019 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of awards and nominations received by Margaret (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ArturSik (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This is a complete list of Margaret's accolades and I think it meets the FL criteria. All the sources are reliable and the lead now includes all the relevant awards/info I think. ArturSik (talk) 22:03, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from ChrisTheDude
- "She has won several accolades during her career" => "She has won various accolades during her career"
- "which she was presented with at the 2014 Sopot " => "with which she was presented at the 2014 Sopot"
- "The song's controversial music video which received substantial media coverage for nudity was" => "The song's controversial music video, which received substantial media coverage for nudity, was"
- "Margaret was also awarded twice" => "Margaret has also received two awards"
- "was honoured with 2016 Róże Gali" => "was honoured with the 2016 Róże Gali"
- There seems to be a stray apostrophe after "Joy" in the title of that award - is that meant to be there?
- " In few circumstances Margaret did not win the main prize, however received an award for coming second, third or fourth" => " In some cases Margaret did not win the main prize, but received an award for coming second, third or fourth"
- Think that's it from me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:43, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- ChrisTheDude all comments addressed. ArturSik (talk) 20:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:52, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from MaranoFan
- I think the names of the respective award ceremonies should be in a separate column. In the current state, the order gets completely messed up if any of the sortable headers are clicked, and the awards appear under the wrong ceremony. You could use List of awards and nominations received by Megan Fox as a reference while fixing this problem.
- Is "Mediafm.net" really a reliable source? I would be iffy about whether its reputed enough to be used on an FL.
- All around, good job with this list. Its comprehensive and there's only one format issue.--NØ 09:46, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- MaranoFan Done. My only concern is the name in the header of the first column. Since there are not only awards but also contests and festivals eg. Baltic Song Contest, I've named it 'Ceremony' instead of 'Award' but not sure if that's okay. ArturSik (talk) 17:34, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Ceremony' is fine. This list has my support for promotion. Great job!--NØ 17:44, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments from Aoba47
- In this part (including five Eska Music Awards out of 11 nominations including Best Female Artist), I would try to avoid using “including” twice in the same sentence.
- In this part (with which she was presented at the 2014 Sopot TOPtrendy Festival.), I do not believe that “with” is necessary.
- For this sentence (She was recognised by Polish Glamour magazine as Glamour Woman of the Year and Fashion Icon in 2014 and 2015 respectively, and was honoured with the 2016 Róże Gali (Gala's Roses) award in the Music category for her collaborative jazz album with Matt Dusk, titled Just the Two of Us.), I would make this into two sentences. The first about the Glamour parts, and the second about the Roze Gali stuff. Currently, it is running a little long.
- For reference 30, “Top Ten” should not be in all caps.
Great work with the list. Once my relatively minor comments are addressed, I will be more than happy to support this. If possible, I would greatly appreciate any feedback on my current FAC. Either way, I hope you are having a wonderful new year so far! Aoba47 (talk) 04:09, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Aoba47 Hi, thank you. You too. I believe I addressed all your comments. Thank you for taking your time to review the list. I will take a look at your list asap and review it the best I can. Take care:) ArturSik (talk) 14:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing everything. I support this for promotion. Aoba47 (talk) 18:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Aoba47 Hi, thank you. You too. I believe I addressed all your comments. Thank you for taking your time to review the list. I will take a look at your list asap and review it the best I can. Take care:) ArturSik (talk) 14:18, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed (well, assuming google translate isn't leading me astray), promoting. --PresN 03:48, 15 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.