Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by Meghan Trainor/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 5 November 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of awards and nominations received by Meghan Trainor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): NØ 13:53, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
After a lot of work on this list I can say that all of the entries on it currently are reliably-sourced and the lead section is also good in my opinion. It meets the FL criteria I think. Considering the fact that Trainor's career has also seen a commercial nosedive, it is very likely that the list will stay stable in the near future.--NØ 13:53, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments
|
---|
|
- Support from Aoba47
- Do you think this image (File:150426 Meghan Trainor.jpg) as it is a little higher quality and is a clearer image of her face (i.e. without the microphone in her face)?
- You will need a reference for this part (Trainor signed a record deal with Epic Records in 2014).
- For this part (which earned her Grammy nominations for both Record of the Year, and Song of the Year.), I do no think that "both" is necessary.
- You use "earned" three times in a close proximity in the first paragraph so I would vary the language to avoid repetition.
- This sentence (Trainor released her major-label debut album Title the following year.) needs a reference. The same comment (Trainor's second major-label studio album Thank You was preceded by its lead single "No".) applies for this sentence.
- Trainer received a few nominations in 2018; should they be mentioned in the lead?
- Each of the individual sections need citations for the descriptions of the awards. The following are a few examples that require citations (ARIA Music Awards, Hollywood Music in Media Awards, Japan Gold Disc Award, Juno Awards, and Latin American Music Awards)
Once my comments are addressed, I will support this for promotion. I hope you found this review to be helpful. Aoba47 (talk) 22:03, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you. I believe I addressed all of your concerns, please tell me if I do something more.--NØ 10:35, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for addressing everything. I support this based on the prose. I do not have an issue with the formatting as it is consistent and well-formatted for this particular article. If you have the time, I would greatly appreciate any comments or suggestions for my current FLC. It is a similar type of a list (i.e. awards and nominations) by someone who's career has taken a much larger nosedive than Trainor's lol. Either way, have a wonderful day and/or night! Aoba47 (talk) 01:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support from BeatlesLedTV
- You got scope cols but still need scope rows per MOS:ACCESS
- Made this edit for you (fixed dashes per MOS:DASH)
Looks good. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 17:22, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you! I added the scope rows here!--NØ 18:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support − All good for me. BeatlesLedTV (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support from The Rambling Man
- Nice work on reformatting the list to the new and improved standard! One standout issue: if Wikipedia doesn't consider ASCAP Pop Music Awards to be notable, why are they included in this list? The Rambling Man (talk) 20:33, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I do think the ASCAP Pop Music Awards are notable tbh. I found coverage in many reliable sources: [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8]. They’re also included in prestigious FLs List of awards and nominations received by Katy Perry and List of awards and nominations received by Madonna so I left them in! Edit: I added wikilinks to the ASCAP page like in the FLs I used as examples.—NØ 21:23, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Firstly, don't cap my comments again without my permission, that's bad form.
- Secondly, good work on fixing up the format to be really much better than the previous.
- Thirdly, thank you for addressing the corollary issues I noted.
- Fourthly, SUPPORT this. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:24, 29 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed, added archivelinks to references, promoting. --PresN 21:40, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.