Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Bill/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was not promoted by Dabomb87 21:42, 28 September 2010 [1].
List of awards and nominations received by The Bill (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Bill/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of awards and nominations received by The Bill/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Courcelles and HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Ladies and gentlemen, I am nominating List of awards and nominations received by The Bill for featured list because I believe that, after much work by myself, Courcelles and several other editors, it meets the Featured List criteria. I believe the prose is of a professional standard and that the lead section defines the scope of the list and provides a concise summary of The Bill as well as a prose summary of the awards and nominations documented by the list. The list is of appropriate length and meets the requirements for a standalone list in that its inclusion in The Bill would make that article excessively long. It is well structured—sorted by award and, within sections, is in chronological order, with section headings that aid navigation and enhance readability. The article has two images, of which one is ineligible for copyright and the other is appropriately licensed and the article is not subject to any sort of edit wars or content disputes. All comments will be gratefully received, though this is my first FLC so go easy! HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:27, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment—no dab links, no dead external links. Ucucha 02:00, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Support—I changed four redirecting links to their corresponding non-redirecting links. I could find no other problems. The list meets all the Featured List criteria. --Dan Dassow (talk) 02:53, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for fixing those links and thanks for the support. :) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 13:42, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:44, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Comment — I think it would look nicer if the column widths were even, and if they year column was centered. See this as an example (I am biased, as I brought this list to FL status, but it illustrates the column widths and centered year column, apart from any sections where the main infobox interferes with the cell widths). More of a suggestion than a demand, but I think it would make for a more aesthetically pleasing list. --Another Believer (Talk) 20:28, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This done, more or less. The wrench in the machine is the last table, which has one more column than the others. Courcelles 23:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Understood, not much can be done about that. The Rambling Man (talk) 07:32, 3 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This done, more or less. The wrench in the machine is the last table, which has one more column than the others. Courcelles 23:08, 2 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.