Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of battleships of Japan/archive1

< Wikipedia:Featured list candidates
The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 01:54:07 10 October 2019 (UTC) [1].

List of battleships of Japan

edit

List of battleships of Japan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Toolbox
Nominator(s): Parsecboy (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC) and Sturmvogel 66 (talk)[reply]

This is a list of all battleships built or acquired by Japan, covering the period between the advent of modern pre-dreadnought battleships in the 1890s and the end of Japan's status as a naval power of the first rank in 1945. This list is the capstone to the Japanese national subtopic of the Operation Majestic Titan special project. It just passed a MILHIST A-class review, so hopefully there aren't many problems that need to be addressed. Thanks to all who take the time to review the list. Parsecboy (talk) 17:46, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CommentsSupport by CPA-5

edit

I guess lists never get old and long too. :) I'll review this one later. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 17:06, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • In 1919, President Woodrow Wilson announced the resumption Add "American" before "President".
    • Good idea
  • US v. U.S.
    • Fixed
  • as part of Admiral Kurita's Center Force.[155][152] Re-order the ref here.
    • Good catch
  • See a lot of British afterwards.
    • Fixed
  • I could remember that you Sturm said to me "True, but I don't want to switch between Imperial and metric formats half-way through the list" however some tables tell to me that metric units are the primary units. Why that now?
    • I think you're referring to gun calibers - the general rule of thumb is to have the primary unit the official name of the gun - Vickers didn't make a 35.6cm gun, they made a 14-inch gun, while the Kure Naval Arsenal didn't build 18.1-inch guns, they built 46cm guns

That's it, I think. Cheers. CPA-5 (talk) 13:43, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks CPA. Parsecboy (talk) 11:45, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@CPA-5:, was there anything else you'd like us to address? Parsecboy (talk) 12:42, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

CommentsSupport by PM

edit

I reviewed this at Milhist ACR, so just a few quibbles here:

  • in the lead, suggest "and rebuilt the Kongō-class battlecruisers into fast battleships and modernized the existing ships"
    • Good catch
  • suggest "The ships were also assigned to the 1st Fleet before the Russo–Japanese War, were present..." to avoid starting a sentence with "Also"
    • Done
  • drop the comma after "Sagami and Suwo," and after "Pobeda"
    • Done
  • "by an air attack ion Kure Naval Base"
    • Fixed
  • which sub sank Shinano? Earlier you have named the sub that sank Kongō
    • Added

That's all I could find. Nice job on this list. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 03:27, 7 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Peacemaker. Parsecboy (talk) 11:49, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, supporting. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 22:54, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comments by ChrisTheDude

edit
  • The first paragraph just has one ref right at the end - does that source the entire para?
    • That's a question for @Sturmvogel 66:
      • I did some digging around, and it does seem to cover the whole paragraph
  • "But to counter" - don't start a sentence with "but" - suggest changing "To counter the Imperial Chinese Beiyang Fleet in the early 1890s, however....."
    • Works for me
  • "they ordered" => "Japan ordered" (to make is absolutely clear who "they" were)
    • Done
  • "rebuilt the Kongō-class battlecruisers into fast battleships and modernizing the existing ships" - seems to be a bit of a grammatical mish-mash here - should it be "modernized"?
    • Fixed per Peacemaker's comment above
  • "As part of the 1st Fleet the sisters participated" - presume the "sisters" are the aforementioned ships? Might be worth clarifying.....
    • Clarified
  • "Sagami and Suwo, were originally" - don't need that comma
    • Fixed
  • "the Satsuma class were obsolete before they were even launched" - previously (eg under "Sagami and Suwo") you treat "class" as a singular noun, here it's plural - best to be consistent
    • Good catch
  • "it couldn't afford to upgrade all of them" => "it could not afford to upgrade all of them"
    • Fixed
  • I've just noticed that "sister ships" is linked under Ise class, even though it's about the eighth time the term is used. Best to link the first usage.
    • Fixed
  • Think that's it from me..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 18:09, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Query - is anyone looking at the comments on this one? Since the FLC was started the article has only received a single edit, which was to add a wikilink, and none of the comments raised above seem to have been looked at in up to three weeks..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:58, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nate, just jogging your memory about these comments. Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 08:00, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, yeah, I think Sturm and I got busy with other things. I'll get to these now. Parsecboy (talk) 11:36, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ChrisTheDude: - is there anything else that needs to be addressed? Thanks again. Parsecboy (talk) 12:54, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source review passed (though of course it's mostly books). Always neat to see an OMT list come through, even after all these years! Promoting. --PresN 01:53, 10 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_list_candidates/List_of_battleships_of_Japan/archive1&oldid=935985283"