Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of ecclesiastical parishes in the Diocese of Bath and Wells/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:32, 4 June 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Contents
List of ecclesiastical parishes in the Diocese of Bath and Wells (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): — Rod talk 17:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This list was created as a bit of an experiment to examine how closely ecclesiastical parishes (EP) match civil parishes, and it may become the standard for a whole load of other UK lists on similar topics. It has gone through multiple iterations (mostly from User:Nilfanion and myself) about how it should be subdivided and what should be included. It is now comprehensive including all EPs in the Diocese of Bath and Wells supported by over 600 references. I feel it now meets the FL criteria but would welcome your comments about the organisation as well as any individual entries.— Rod talk 17:38, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- quick comment: "This is a list of... " is no longer appropriate for featured lists, as it is tautological. Mattximus (talk) 19:46, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks - tweaked.— Rod talk 20:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Same goes for "When the civil parish is identical to the ecclesiastical parish, this is shown in the tables below in bold." Which should be a note for the table (or in a legend), not in the lead itself. I don't have time for a full review, but just want to say great work on the page so far! Mattximus (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove that if appropriate. A footnote on the lines of "identical to civil parish" should suffice for those cases where there is a 1:1 correspondence.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you do this to ensure it meets what you were trying to achieve with the list.— Rod talk 18:27, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove that if appropriate. A footnote on the lines of "identical to civil parish" should suffice for those cases where there is a 1:1 correspondence.--Nilfanion (talk) 18:07, 16 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Same goes for "When the civil parish is identical to the ecclesiastical parish, this is shown in the tables below in bold." Which should be a note for the table (or in a legend), not in the lead itself. I don't have time for a full review, but just want to say great work on the page so far! Mattximus (talk) 21:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks - tweaked.— Rod talk 20:55, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 08:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:59, 15 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Rodw, The Rambling Man, and Mattximus: I've removed the bolding, replacing it with a footnote. I think that gives the message more clearly and in a compliant fashion now?--Nilfanion (talk) 20:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support my concerns addressed. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:54, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comments by Dudley
edit- "Each parish is administered by a parish priest who may be assisted in his pastoral duties by a curate or curates, who are also ordained but not the parish priest." This does not sound right. Maybe "also ordained but are not parish priests".
- Done.— Rod talk 18:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- " A benefice or living in the Church of England describes any ecclesiastical parish or group of ecclesiastical parishes under a single stipendiary minister, as well as its related historical meaning." I would delete " as well as its related historical meaning" as unnecessary and confusing.
- Done.— Rod talk 18:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- "The term dates from the grant of benefices by bishops to clerks in holy orders as a reward for extraordinary services." I cannot see anything about extraordinary services in the source.
- The source does say "on the ground of some extraordinary merit on the part of the grantee." which I think has been rephrased.— Rod talk 18:24, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- This seems to me misleading. The article says that the term dates from the grants of land to soldiers in the Roman Empire, and was adopted by the church on the Continent in the sixth century for grants of land to clergy of extraordinary merit. Extraordinary merit is different from extraordinary services, and "clerks in holy orders" are not mentioned. The term may not have been used in sixth century Frankia. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:36, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I have removed that sentence as it is explained at benefice which is wikilinked from that paragraph.— Rod talk 16:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The rest of the paragraph is unreferenced.
- Ref added for civil parishes but I'm not sure the final sentence can be sourced.— Rod talk 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- "The area covered includes the Chew Valley, and used less formally to cover other nearby areas" I do not understand this. Surely an area must be formally either in or out of a deanery area?
- Changed to "and surrounding areas.— Rod talk 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- What does "unparished" mean?
- See comment & responses to TRM in capped section above - where User:Nilfanion said "::*Bath has parishes - there are several ecclesiastical parishes listed in the relevant section. It doesn't have civil parishes, and an appropriate wikilink to unparished area should suffice. That is the correct term, although it is somewhat confusing in this context...".— Rod talk 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Is information available on which parishes have alternative oversight?
- I will go and look for this.— Rod talk 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The Bishops of Ebbsfleet provides alternative oversight to this area, see [2]. Not sure how to format, but that fact is probably more interesting than most.--Nilfanion (talk) 17:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The Bishop of Ebbsfleet is included (and I've added a reference for this) however I can not find a list of which parishes this applies to.— Rod talk 10:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- "Most of the undeveloped area is within the Bristol and Bath Green Belt." Does undeveloped mean rural? If so, I think it is a better word.
- Some is rural farmland, but there centres of population, so I think it might depend on your definition of "rural" but have changed & linked to Rural area (see Rural area#United Kingdom for some definitions but I don't know if the area covered by the Chew Magna Deanery strictly meets this (even though I live in it).— Rod talk 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- "The area is split between Bath and North East Somerset and Mendip." I would clarify that you are referring to local government areas.
- Done
- This is a first rate list, but I do not think that you should have so many names, especially of deans. It will be very difficult to ensure that the article is always kept up to date. Dudley Miles (talk) 21:33, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments. I am only aware of four names & then change very infrequently
- I am not sure whether we are talking about the same thing regarding names. I find around 18 deans, each of whom you name, and with other officials you name about 24. There must surely be several changes each year with promotions, retirements etc?
- I will remove the specific names at Deanery level as I try to add the location coords but will leave this at Archdeaconry level as these are more significant, fewer & don't change often.— Rod talk 10:26, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Dudley Miles (talk) 20:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. I have now removed the names at Deanery level.— Rod talk 16:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Cmnt
editI think this sort of list, since it covers public locations, should include address or map locations. Nergaal (talk) 22:22, 14 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks. This would not be simple as the parishes covers irregular areas of widely different sizes. We could give the grid refs for the churches (which are all available in the church articles) but these would not necessarily be a central point in the parish & would get complex where there is more than one church in the parish.— Rod talk 19:12, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- There are many entries with no linked article. Considering the scope of this list, having some locator here would be quite convenient. Nergaal (talk) 20:11, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Would you suggest that the grid ref/lat long of the church is given?16:59, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
- I have changed the first table (Deanery of Bath) to include the coords - could you look at this to see if it is what you mean before I do the rest? - with a long list like this it is a significant edit.— Rod talk 16:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your help. I've now done all tables. Could you take a look & make sure this is what you intended.— Rod talk 16:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Review by PresN
edit- "The parish with its local parish church is the basic unit of the Church of England." - halfway through this paragraph, you change subjects entirely, and not as a short setup for discussing parishes within Bath and Wells. I think that it would flow better if the first half of this paragraph was a part of the 1st paragraph, and the rest with the 3rd, even if that makes the (new) second paragraph a bit long.
- Done.— Rod talk 10:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- "Such a life freehold is now subject to certain constraints" - this sentence is odd, given that there's nothing else for the "now" to be set against, and since it doesn't say what the constraints are the sentence doesn't mean very much.
- Removed.— Rod talk 10:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- It's odd that you call out that there are 12,600 parishes in the CofE, but don't say how many parishes are in Bath and Wells (I know it's in the infobox, but still).
- Added.— Rod talk 10:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- "The deadery covers villages in South Somerset and Taunton Deane" - deanery?
- Well spotted - changed.— Rod talk 10:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Grid refs for the churches would be good, I think (perhaps with a note up at the top that its for the church(s), not the center of the area); area polygons for the parishes is far too heavy an ask even if it'd be more helpful.
- I am going to work on adding grid refs over the next day or two. Nilfanion would be much better than me to comment on polygons & maps than I am.— Rod talk 10:34, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Also, can we get a small map of where in England this diocese is? Like the kind in Somerset, with "Somerset and small areas of Devon, Dorset, Gloucestershire and Wiltshire" shaded?
- With regards to maps/polygons, the CofE has created online data which could easily be adapted. Unfortunately its licensing is too restrictive for us (and I have asked). That rules out individual maps for each parish. For small scale maps, the civil parishes could be used as an approximation and would capture the major deviations from the county boundary.--Nilfanion (talk) 22:44, 19 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The tables do not meet WP:ACCESS requirements; specifically, they need colscopes and rowscopes. --PresN 18:53, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- I have changed the first table (Deanery of Bath) to include column & row scope - could you look at this to see if it is what you mean before I do the rest? - with a long list like this it is a significant edit.— Rod talk 16:03, 18 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Almost, with rowspans you have to have a line break after the first column's cells. I've done this for you in that first table. --PresN 15:58, 21 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the advice (and example). I've copied your lead with the next couple of deaneries and will work on doing these (along with coords) for the others over the next few days.— Rod talk 17:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks - I've followed your lead and now done the other tables. Could you check this now meets WP:ACCESS requirements please.— Rod talk 16:00, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Looks good, Support. --PresN 02:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:08, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.