Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Marvan Atapattu/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was archived by Giants2008 01:03, 7 October 2015 [1].
List of international cricket centuries by Marvan Atapattu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Marvan Atapattu/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of international cricket centuries by Marvan Atapattu/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): The Rambling Man, Royroydeb
Another cricket list. Well I've scrubbed this one up a bit, it was in good nick thanks to the sterling work of Royroydeb but needed some tweaks which I applied. It's in good shape, but, as ever, thanks to those of you who contribute, comment, support, etc. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:23, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Marvan Atapattu is only 713 words long, and already includes bad versions of these tables. As things stand in that parent article, I think this list could very easily be merged into that article, rather than being a standalone list. Harrias talk 20:31, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, I was working off the template, so I suppose this nom should be closed, the work I've done should be merged, even though it's better than the bio article, and I'll live to fight another day? I would prefer the list to live, but if it doesn't, hey, whatever. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:36, 26 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's see what sort of state we can improve the main article to over the next few days, this list might still have a chance! Harrias talk 08:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Ok, sounds good to me, thanks. The Rambling Man (talk) 08:42, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Let's see what sort of state we can improve the main article to over the next few days, this list might still have a chance! Harrias talk 08:41, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @The Rambling Man and Harrias: It's been nearly five weeks since this comment about whether a standalone list is needed was made. There has been no change in terms of the parent article. Perhaps it's time to merge back this table back to the parent article? Cowlibob (talk) 13:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- I agree, it's a shame, but at least the parent article will benefit. Happy (sort of) to withdraw this nomination. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:34, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:20, 7 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.