Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:31, 18 September 2017 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria/archive1
- Featured list candidates/List of international cricket five-wicket hauls by Danish Kaneria/archive2
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Vibhijain (talk) and Khadar Khani (talk) 12:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Previously nominated back in 2015, the list got sufficient 'supports' from reviewers but couldn't get through. Again, I would like to have Vibhijain as co-nominator since he has created the list. Comments and suggestions from anyone are much appreciated. Regards, Khadar Khani (talk) 12:25, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I've had a quick look at this, and can't find anything that's an issue. Please compare this to the issues raised at the West Indies FLC, esp. any style issues raised by The Rambling Man. Should be good to go! Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 07:50, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Lugnuts: already done with row and col scopes. Thanks for the comment! Khadar Khani (talk) 11:00, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Sahara4u: To open a second nomination, the unwritten rule is that the first candidate should have a minimum of three supports with no outstanding concerns. Btw, welcome back to FLC! —Vensatry (talk) 06:24, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Vensatry: Thank you and I think your concern is resolved! Khadar Khani (talk) 14:22, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - my only query at the moment is that the last paragraph of the lead seems to essentially be there to clarify why there are no ODI fifers on the list, but there isn't an equivalent bit of wording for T20. As far as I can see he never actually played in a T20 international, but as he did play in the era when they existed it might be worth mentioning........? -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 11:46, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude: added "Kaneria never played Twenty20 International matches." Khadar Khani (talk) 14:27, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- In that case I am happy to support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 14:29, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Harrias |
---|
;Comments from Harrias talk
I reviewed this list back at its first nomination in 2015, and was happy with it. I do have a couple of thoughts though:
Overall this is pretty much there, as evidenced by my support in 2015. Any chance you could take a look at Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/England cricket team Test results (1920–39)/archive3? Harrias talk 10:17, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support nice work, I was happy to support last time, and I'm happy to do so again now. Harrias talk 13:20, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from —Vensatry (talk) 13:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments from Vensatry
—Vensatry (talk) 18:11, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support, nice work —Vensatry (talk) 13:04, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – All of the references look reliable and well-formatted. I spot-checked refs 19, 22, and 24, and have a question. Is the Innings column supposed to list the total number of innings in the match, or the innings when the haul happened? If the latter (which is implied by the key), then I'm confused because the references imply that the hauls I checked occurred in the first innings of the respective matches, not the second innings as the list says. This is unless I'm reading the cites wrong, which is possible as I'm not familiar with cricket stat-keeping. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:19, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It's innings of the match. Kaneria's five-wicket haul came in Australia's first innings, which was the second innings of the match, coming after Pakistan's first innings. Harrias talk 06:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Same applies for ref #22 and #24. Khadar Khani (talk) 06:15, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- It's innings of the match. Kaneria's five-wicket haul came in Australia's first innings, which was the second innings of the match, coming after Pakistan's first innings. Harrias talk 06:10, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Ianblair23 (talk) 03:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
:Hi Vibhijain and Khadar Khani, please find my comments below:
|
- Support – Great job Vibhijain and Khadar Khani. Cheers – Ianblair23 (talk) 03:56, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 21:37, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.