Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of number-one albums of 2008 (Japan)/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 01:43, 10 May 2009 [1].
Toolbox |
---|
I am nominating this for featured list because I believe that it meets WP:FL's criteria and feedback could also help the article improve, if needed. ~Moon~月と暁~Sunrise~ 03:43, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
done ~Moon~月と暁~Sunrise~ 17:33, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
- Support -- Previous issues resolved; the list now meets WP:WIAFL. Great work for one of the first album lists from Japan.--Truco 14:46, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:03, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:58, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Companies and websites (e.g. Oricon and Excite) should not be italicized.Dabomb87 (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I don't know how to remove the italicization. The cite web template did that itself. ~Moon~月と暁~Sunrise~ 16:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Change
work=
topublisher=
in the templates. Dabomb87 (talk) 16:20, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]- done ~Moon~月と暁~Sunrise~ 16:31, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Change
Per the MOS, link titles in the references shouldn't be in all capitals, even when they are in the original.Dabomb87 (talk) 18:13, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Done? Does that exclude YMO, SMAP, and KAT-TUN? Because all three are acronyms. ~Moon~月と暁~Sunrise~ 18:34, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep. Dabomb87 (talk) 20:39, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove "which is"?
- "2008" looks like a useless sea of trivia in the year article. For hidden links like this, why not instead list them in the "See also" section (UNpiped and possibly with your expert comment for readers). Otherwise, no one's gonna click on them. And separate the numbers: "In 2008 alone, 37 albums reached the peak of the chart." ... or put "in 2008" at the end of the sentence. Or "2008 saw 37" ...
- "eighteen" but "28"? See WP:MOSNUM on spelling out.
- in 2008, not of?
- "1,447,149 copies"? I hope it's iron-clad accurate; otherwise, don't repeat your source's unreasonable claim to accuracy: "more than 1.4 million copies" ... easier to read, too. Same one second later.
- The source clearly says the number of the sales. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 11:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think what Tony is saying is that it's a super-extraordinary claim, and one that should be supported by more than one reference. Narrowing down to such an accurate figure is dangerous. "The best-selling album overall of 2008 was R&B group Exile's Exile Love, released in late 2007, which sold 1,470,959 copies. The second-best-selling album was Amuro's Best Fiction, which sold 1,447,149 copies, followed by pop folk band Kobukuro's 5296, with 1,404,658 albums sold." For one thing, the reference is dated December 11; that leaves 20 more days in 2008 to accumulate more sales, meaning the figure is probably wrong (and yes, I'm aware of Verifiability vs Truth). If the paragraph said "The best-selling album overall of 2008 was R&B group Exile's Exile Love, released in late 2007, which sold over 1,470,000 copies. The second-best-selling album was Amuro's Best Fiction, which sold more than 1,447,000 copies, followed by pop folk band Kobukuro's 5296, with nearly 1,405,000 albums sold." it's still correct and the source still verifies the statement. Please follow up with Tony at his talk page to make sure that I'm not putting words in his mouth, though. His concern may be different and I've interpreted it wrong. One other thing here, could you do something about the "parastub"biness of the two sentences? Matthewedwards : Chat 06:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Oricon starts it's new chart in the middle of December of the previous year and ends it in the middle of December the current year. The sale figures are correct. Any sales made after the yearly chart is posted and ends gets counted into the new yearly chart, in this case the 2009 yearly chart. The source which supports the claim is from the Oricon itself, which is the official chart in Japan. Anyway I'll ask him if that's what he meant. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 12:15, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think what Tony is saying is that it's a super-extraordinary claim, and one that should be supported by more than one reference. Narrowing down to such an accurate figure is dangerous. "The best-selling album overall of 2008 was R&B group Exile's Exile Love, released in late 2007, which sold 1,470,959 copies. The second-best-selling album was Amuro's Best Fiction, which sold 1,447,149 copies, followed by pop folk band Kobukuro's 5296, with 1,404,658 albums sold." For one thing, the reference is dated December 11; that leaves 20 more days in 2008 to accumulate more sales, meaning the figure is probably wrong (and yes, I'm aware of Verifiability vs Truth). If the paragraph said "The best-selling album overall of 2008 was R&B group Exile's Exile Love, released in late 2007, which sold over 1,470,000 copies. The second-best-selling album was Amuro's Best Fiction, which sold more than 1,447,000 copies, followed by pop folk band Kobukuro's 5296, with nearly 1,405,000 albums sold." it's still correct and the source still verifies the statement. Please follow up with Tony at his talk page to make sure that I'm not putting words in his mouth, though. His concern may be different and I've interpreted it wrong. One other thing here, could you do something about the "parastub"biness of the two sentences? Matthewedwards : Chat 06:55, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Can you widen the first column so that it's more likely to avoid the wrapping of many of the dates? Rob from the second (or better, the last) column.
- I don't know how to widen the columns. Can you tell me how? 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 11:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- So the nav-box should be tucked away right down the bottom?
- List of number-one albums of 2008 (U.S.) has the box at the bottom. Where do you propose I put it then? 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 11:25, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I think this one will be fine also; the navbox placement is a WikiProject standard. Dabomb87 (talk) 23:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I think it probably will pass, but needs a little finishing off. Tony (talk) 06:15, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments
|
- Moon, the hyper-accurate figure is no big deal. Matthew explains it perfectly: which particular hour was that arrived at? It will remain for ages until updated in this list. But it was only a thought. Tony (talk) 17:42, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed it again. Do you support the article now or...? 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 17:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tony doesn't usually support; if his concerns are addressed that's usually good enough for him. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- OIC. Thanks for informing me. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 23:40, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Tony doesn't usually support; if his concerns are addressed that's usually good enough for him. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:17, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed it again. Do you support the article now or...? 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 17:51, 30 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - why does dates of chart go from April 7 to April 19? And the publication date of the reference for the album on April 19 is April 10 - did they predict the future? Same with ref 23, dated 1 April but used to reference April 7 charts... Perhaps there's a simple explanation for this? The Rambling Man (talk) 12:50, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I made a mistake while editing the article. It's suppose to be April 14. The Oricon charts work like the Billboard charts. 月 (Moon)と暁 (Sunrise) 13:10, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.