Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of places of worship in Crawley/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 07:12, 11 April 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): Hassocks5489 (tickets please!)
Toolbox |
---|
This is a comprehensive list of all places of worship in Crawley, a medium-sized town and borough in Southern England. I have tried to keep the use of churches' own websites to a minimum (and in any case to verify uncontroversial info only). The three missing pictures will be taken soon! This is intended to be a precursor to a nom of a similar but much larger and more ambitious list, so all feedback will be gratefully received. Thanks, Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:23, 18 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]
Resolved comments from Chrishomingtang
|
---|
Comment
Everything else looks good—Chris! ct 01:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support —Chris! ct 00:28, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Matthewedwards asked me to revisit this FLC due to recent criteria change and I still think it fulfills the criteria, so I stand by my support.—Chris! ct 05:01, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I hope you didn't mind my moving the list; lists' names usually start "List of...". Dabomb87 (talk) 00:06, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- →No, that's fine; tomorrow I'll do the same to the other similar list I mentioned above (which had actually started life as a prose-style article before I listified it). Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 00:09, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved to meet WP:WIAFL standards. Good work.--Best, ₮RUCӨ 19:40, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support definitely a good article, at this points, honestly, I'm sorry I can't suggest much to modify, as it's already pretty OK. Not necessary, but maybe wouldn't have been a bad idea, would have been a distinct column with the years of construction; but I understand this would have depleyed the notes tomuch in some cases.--Aldux (talk) 23:07, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:14, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues (includes resolved naming discussion), Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) Really nice article.
Comment about name Why is it "churches and places of worship"? Is a church not a place of worship? Dabomb87 (talk) 01:42, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the latest comments; I will do another sweep through the article in ~3 hours in case I have missed any of Dabomb's points. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 09:02, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
|
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 01:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comments -please forgive me if I mention something that has been discussed already, these are my feelings coming at the list raw.
|
WeakSupport - sorry for not getting back to you, real life has been pounding my skull lately. So, I think you've done really well to address my concerns, the only outstanding issue (which I can't oppose for, since it's not one of the criteria) is a lead image. I would be happy to see an image that isn't necessarily repeated, nor a pair etc, but perhaps just a really nice image of one of the subjects of the list. I understand that people may perhaps complain that it would give undue weight to one of the places of worship, but it would certainly make the list much much more attractive to a passing reader if there was something other than text for the first screen's worth. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:32, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- → Many thanks for your comments. Going through my pics again, I found a nice one showing a different view of St Nicholas' Church. As it is the oldest and arguably most architecturally important in the Borough, it seems like a reasonable choice, so I have uploaded and added. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 10:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All good. Great work. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:35, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- → Many thanks for your comments. Going through my pics again, I found a nice one showing a different view of St Nicholas' Church. As it is the oldest and arguably most architecturally important in the Borough, it seems like a reasonable choice, so I have uploaded and added. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 10:26, 10 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Quadell's suggestions
Resolved comments from Quadell
|
---|
|
- Support. Great list. Well done! – Quadell (talk) 12:02, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Despite the new FL criteria, this list is still up to those standards. Still support.--Truco 14:55, 9 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.