Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs in the Guitar Hero: On Tour series/archive2
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:24, 25 July 2009 [1].
- Nominator(s): MASEM (t) 21:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Toolbox |
---|
Previous FLC failed from lack of input; now that the game is out, this has the complete lists for the latest game in the series. MASEM (t) 21:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk) |
---|
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) Skipping ahead of the other FLCs to expedite your GH FT process :)
|
Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 17:33, 9 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 21:55, 6 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Although i agree with the previous FLC that the change in table formats, especially the colours, is jarring, i think the reason given is acceptable. (Would it be a good idea to change the colours in all the list from the very bright red/green?).YobMod 14:05, 13 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm using the {{yes}} and {{no}} templates where it is getting this color from. (Way before, at one point, I was using the checkmark but this was nixed in a FLC for a different GH song list). It might be worthwhile considering working to lighten up those colors at those templates directly. --MASEM (t) 00:04, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
|
- Support -- Previous issues resolved/clarified; list meets WP:WIAFL.--Truco 503 18:11, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- In Guitar Hero: On Tour and Guitar Hero: On Tour Decades, there are 5 songs in each tier in Career mode, and in each tier, there is an encore song, which is the 5th song played out of the 5 songs in the tier. The (encore) in the charts mean that the song is one of those encore songs. I'm not sure if (encore) is really needed there though. — RyanCross (talk) 07:42, 21 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support
Resolved comments from MPJ-DK
|
---|
|
- I agree that the lead is not contentious at all so it's not a big deal to me. The rest looks to be resolved, I am on board with the variations in table contents and everything else. So support. MPJ-DK (talk) 08:31, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.