Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Basshunter/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 12:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Contents
List of songs recorded by Basshunter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Eurohunter (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
List of songs recorded by Swedish musician Basshunter. The last song "Ingen kan slå (Boten Anna)" was released on 23 June 2023. He has recorded a lot of unreleased tracks like "Livets fard", "Horn of Orcs", "Ni är det bästa som finns" or "The Indian" but they never were mentioned in any publication so I had to omitted them. It previously passed GOCE and was peer-reviewed. Structure is after similar featured lists. Eurohunter (talk) 21:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from MyCatIsAChonk
editSurprised to see no comments after three weeks on the market- happy to review. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
He published his music mainly through the internet.
- rather vague, to what sites? BandCamp? YouTube?- Comment: Unfortunately there is no source mention certain websites but I added "for free download on platforms such as chat channels and gaming websites.". Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- That's better. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:15, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Every time a year is used as a dependent clause (e.g. "In 2008...") it needs to be followed by a comma. Right now, only some instances have commas.
- Done. Commas added. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Same thing for "According to ____...", anytime a clause like that is stated it must be followed by a comma
- Done. I added commas but I'm not sure of first case - "According to Swedish magazine Filter, in 2004, Basshunter had already composed up to 300 songs." - not too many commas? Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- That's just fine. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
His album, The Old Shit, and The Bassmachine were...
- is that not two albums being listed? If not, clarify- Comment: What do you mean by "being listed"? The Bassmachine is a studio album and The Old Shit is a compilation album. Both albums were released at the time in 2006 on Basshunter website. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Now I understand, my confusion was between the difference of the two. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:16, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Not sure if I'm misunderstanding, but the article for LOL says it was his second studio album, while this article says it was his first- same numbering issue with Now You're Gone
- Done. Yes. LOL is the second studio album and Now You're Gone – The Album is the third studio album. I don't know what happened, but I fixed it. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The "Writer" cell for "Al final" needs a cross
- Done. Added. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Songs that start with "the" should be sorted by the word after it (e.g. "The Basshunter" should be sorted as "Basshunter, The")
- Done. Order changed. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Same applies to the "Album" column
- Done. Order changed. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Footnote "as" has a typo, should read, "Originally released as single, "Welcome to Rainbow" was released on later release of Now You're Gone – The Album.[9]"
- Comment: Do you mean just missing comma? I added it. Should I also add comma to note i and t? Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Ironically, I think I made a typo in my own comment. Disregard this comment. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:18, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- File:James Lord Pierpont.jpg - source link is dead and it needs an international PD tag
- Comment: What do you mean by "international PD tag"? Do you mean that jinglebellschurch.org/history.htm is a dead link? There is archived version, but I don't see anything related. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eurohunter, firstly, yes, the archive url needs to be added to be description. Secondly, the tag under "Licensing" only covers its PD status internationally (I got it backwards in the comment, my apologies). It need another tag to cover its status in the US.
PD-old-expired
should be right. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Comment: @MyCatIsAChonk: I added link to archived version. Why it need another tag to cover its status in the United Status? What about Mexico and the other countries? Template PD-old-expired for the United States mention United States Copyright Office, but I don't know if it's registered there. Eurohunter (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eurohunter, Wikimedia servers are in the US, so they must comply with US copyright law. But, because media on Commons are used across all Wikipedias, media must also be available internationally. Now, I realized an error on my part- how can it be PD in countries with a 70+ author death copyright term if the author is unknown? My bad-
PD-anon-expired
should be right because it states that it was published before 1928 (making it public domain in the US) and that it was published over 95 years ago (making it public domain in most countries). MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 17:07, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]- Done @MyCatIsAChonk: I changed template PD-old to PD-anon-expired. Eurohunter (talk) 17:14, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eurohunter, Wikimedia servers are in the US, so they must comply with US copyright law. But, because media on Commons are used across all Wikipedias, media must also be available internationally. Now, I realized an error on my part- how can it be PD in countries with a 70+ author death copyright term if the author is unknown? My bad-
- Comment: @MyCatIsAChonk: I added link to archived version. Why it need another tag to cover its status in the United Status? What about Mexico and the other countries? Template PD-old-expired for the United States mention United States Copyright Office, but I don't know if it's registered there. Eurohunter (talk) 16:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Eurohunter, that's all from me, good work! MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:22, 18 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Summary: @MyCatIsAChonk: Your comments have been noted and issues has been taken into account. Some issues require further comments from you. Thank you. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- See responses above- only one requires further action. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support- very nice work, all my points have been addressed. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 17:19, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- See responses above- only one requires further action. MyCatIsAChonk (talk) (not me) (also not me) (still no) 15:23, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from ULPS
editNot too many, (MyCatIsAChonk commented on most of my concerns) but I'll add to them if I see anything else. ULPS (talk • contribs) 23:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
His album, The Old Shit, and The Bassmachine were released on his website in 2006.
. You already mentioned The Bassmachine being released in 2004, as well as his music being released through the internet, what is special about this release that you stated it again? Did it come out for free? Probably clarify.- Comment: Yes, I added it because actually both albums were released on the same time on Basshunter website, so I think just to mention The Old Shit would be not enough or out of context. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I still think it's a bit weird to mention again, perhaps say The Old Shit and The Bassmachine were made available to purchase through his website in 2006? ULPS (talk • contribs) 15:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Yes, they both were released in 2006 on Basshunter website, but only The Old Shit was actually premiered and The Bassmachine was released already earlier in 2004. Eurohunter (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Then that is fine I guess, no way to really write that without being too clunky. ULPS (talk • contribs) 18:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Yes, they both were released in 2006 on Basshunter website, but only The Old Shit was actually premiered and The Bassmachine was released already earlier in 2004. Eurohunter (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I still think it's a bit weird to mention again, perhaps say The Old Shit and The Bassmachine were made available to purchase through his website in 2006? ULPS (talk • contribs) 15:13, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Yes, I added it because actually both albums were released on the same time on Basshunter website, so I think just to mention The Old Shit would be not enough or out of context. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The album consisted of seven songs from two previous Basshunter albums, The Old Shit, and all 10 songs from The Bassmachine
. I am not quite sure what this is saying, is it 7 songs total from two previous albums, something from The Old Shit and all of The Bassmachine? Why is the number of tracks from The Old Shit not mentioned? The sentence should be reworded for clarity.- Done. I don't know why, but it was kinda unclear. I changed it to "The album mostly consisted of songs from two previous Basshunter albums, 7 songs from The Old Shit, and all 10 songs from The Bassmachine." Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- The grammar in footnote "b" is a bit off, I believe the meaning is something along the lines of "
According to the ACE Repertory, the song "Utan stjärnorna" was co-written by Basshunter and Ali Payami. However, in the 2006 release of Basshunter's "LOL" album, the song, translated as "Without Stars," is credited solely to Basshunter as both the writer and producer.
- Comment: It's good idea, but I wanted to mention that LOL had different versions released in different time, and it was just one of the versions. So I would like to use your idea but there need to be mention that it is not the original/first/premier version of LOL - I don't know how to mention it. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the way I stated it works (2006 release implies there was another release IMO), but you could say "second release" (or whatever number release it was). You could also say the "2006 re-release" ULPS (talk • contribs) 15:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: @ULPS: There is a lot of physical and digital versions - exact release dates are not known for some versions, so then it would be very hard to count if it's 6th or 7th version etc. Eurohunter (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- So why not say the 2006 re-release? ULPS (talk • contribs) 18:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: @ULPS: Hard to say. For example, if someone released an album in the United Kingdom on CD then two weeks later the same or other version would be released in Sweden - would we call it a re-release? Eurohunter (talk) 11:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eurohunter: Yeah I guess not. I think the grammar can still be cleaned up from
Later 2006 release of LOL album at "Without Stars" it indicates that Basshunter solely written and produced song
toOn the later 2006 release of LOL at "Without Stars" it indicates that Basshunter solely wrote and produced the song
. This doesn't change the meaning, just the grammar. I made this change myself, feel free to revert if you think of something better :) ULPS (talk • contribs) 15:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]- @ULPS: Comment: I think it's better and I will fix the other cases in the same way. Eurohunter (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Great! ULPS (talk • contribs) 15:29, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @ULPS: Comment: I think it's better and I will fix the other cases in the same way. Eurohunter (talk) 15:24, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Eurohunter: Yeah I guess not. I think the grammar can still be cleaned up from
- Comment: @ULPS: Hard to say. For example, if someone released an album in the United Kingdom on CD then two weeks later the same or other version would be released in Sweden - would we call it a re-release? Eurohunter (talk) 11:35, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- So why not say the 2006 re-release? ULPS (talk • contribs) 18:29, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: @ULPS: There is a lot of physical and digital versions - exact release dates are not known for some versions, so then it would be very hard to count if it's 6th or 7th version etc. Eurohunter (talk) 17:03, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the way I stated it works (2006 release implies there was another release IMO), but you could say "second release" (or whatever number release it was). You could also say the "2006 re-release" ULPS (talk • contribs) 15:10, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: It's good idea, but I wanted to mention that LOL had different versions released in different time, and it was just one of the versions. So I would like to use your idea but there need to be mention that it is not the original/first/premier version of LOL - I don't know how to mention it. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
That's all from me, nice job! ULPS (talk • contribs) 23:29, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Summary: @ULPS: Your comments have been noted and issues has been taken into account. Some issues require further comments from you. Thank you. Eurohunter (talk) 14:58, 20 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Support ULPS (talk • contribs) 15:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from A Thousand Doors
editResolved comments from A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 20:11, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Looks good overall. These are my edits, please revert if you don't agree with them.
My current open FLC is Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Timeline of Brexit/archive1. If you have any time, I'd welcome any comments on it. Thanks, A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 10:30, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Apologies for not responding to this sooner. I have made some further edits here. Please revert if you don't agree with them.
|
- Support A Thousand Doors (talk | contribs) 09:20, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Drive-by comment
edit- If you sort the table by a column such as year, and then re-sort the "title" column, all the songs starting with "The" now appear under T. This is wrong, they should appear under the first letter of their second word (as they do when you initially arrive on the article) -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 13:19, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. @ChrisTheDude: Fixed Eurohunter (talk) 15:35, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- @Casualdejekyll: expressed concerns on the talk page about the scope of the list but the issue was explained. Eurohunter (talk) 18:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Done. Eurohunter (talk) 18:09, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed; promoting. --PresN 02:41, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.