Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by SchroCattalk 20:53, 29 October 2015 [1].
List of songs recorded by Lady Gaga (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Frankie talk 20:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC), Calvin999, GagaNutella, IndianBio, SNUGGUMS[reply]
We've been working on the list for a while. However, we never came up with the conclusion as to who should be the one to nominate it. Anyway, the list is pretty comprehensive, listing down all of her notable songs. Constructive criticism, in any form and from anyone, will be appreciated. Hoping for the best. -- Frankie talk 20:00, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Birdienest81 (talk) 18:36, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
;Comments by Birdienest81
|
- Support: I have no more reservations preventing me from supporting this list. Well done.
- --Birdienest81 (talk) 18:39, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Birdienest81: thank you so much for your support! GagaNutellatalk 18:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Much appreciated :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 19:19, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Birdienest81: thank you so much for your support! GagaNutellatalk 18:45, 15 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I think the list looks great and the prose is very well-written. The only issue that I have is one dead url. Erick (talk) 02:55, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Hi Magiciandude. Turns out it is a working link and that there was a typo at the end of the URL. Fixed now. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:08, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Great job guys! Erick (talk) 03:53, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:54, 17 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from WikiRedactor
|
---|
My editing has been very limited this year, please forgive my critique for being sub-par!
WikiRedactor (talk) 02:30, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Your review was most definitely not sub-par, WikiRedactor! All addressed. Snuggums (talk / edits) 03:24, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry for the delayed response! I am happy with the changes, and am confident in giving my support for the nomination. Good work! WikiRedactor (talk) 00:58, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- No problem. Thank you, WikiRedactor!
- Thank you for supporting :) Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:14, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from — Cirt (talk) 04:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Comment: Quite high quality, very well done, thank you very much to all who worked on this quality improvement project. One recommendation: please add in-line citations to back up the unsourced factual assertions in the Notes sect. After that, should be all set. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 05:48, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support. Thanks very much for GagaNutella for being so polite and responsive to my comments, above. — Cirt (talk) 04:18, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank YOU Cirt for your support. It means a lot to all of us. I'm very grateful. Bye. GagaNutellatalk 04:22, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- You're most welcome, GagaNutella, thank you for your Quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia, and doing so while comporting yourself so politely. You're a rare find. :) — Cirt (talk) 04:25, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- We learn from our own mistakes, Cirt. Again, thank you. GagaNutellatalk 04:29, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- You're definitely correct. — Cirt (talk) 04:30, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Much appreciated, Cirt. Thank you for supporting! Snuggums (talk / edits) 04:44, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Azealia911 talk 13:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
I disagree with WikiRedactor, per WP:OLINK, tables are an exception when it comes to things being linked more than once. Depending on how you organize the table, you get a different occurrence of an album name first, EG: Sorting the tables by song means the first occurrence of Artpop is "Applause", however if we sort the table by other performer(s), "Do What U Want" occurs first, and is unlinked.
|
- Support: any comments over at my FLC would also be greatly appreciated. Azealia911 talk 13:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @Azealia911: Thanks for supporting. I confess I'm not very good with discographies, but I might give a look. By the way, I love her, this month I attended to Perry's concert and she was the opening act, she is really great!!! GagaNutellatalk 13:06, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Many thanks indeed. Snuggums (talk / edits) 14:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. – SchroCat (talk) 20:50, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.