Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of tallest buildings and structures in Tokyo
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Scorpion0422 23:58, 3 February 2009 [1].
I have been working on this list for quite awhile. I overhauled it substantially a few months ago and have been tweaking it ever since. Based off of similar tallest buildings featured lists, I think it meets all FL criteria: it's comprehensive, stable, well-referenced, well-organized, useful, and complete. Let me know of any concerns so I can address them ASAP! --TorsodogTalk 17:27, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Truco
|
---|
Comments from Truco (talk · contribs)
|
- Support - problems fixed to meet WP:WIAFL.TRUCO 22:48, 26 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
We don't start lists out as "this is a list of..." anymore. Take a look at List of tallest buildings in Vancouver for a suggestion. Also, in the title, "structures" seems redundant and isn't consistent with other similar lists. Dabomb87 (talk) 22:24, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Odd, almost all of the tallest buildings FLs start out with the "this is a list of...", but I will happily change it. Also, the structures portion is consistent with lists for cities that contain tall structures. See:London, Salford and Manchester. If this is also changed for some reason, however, let me know. --TorsodogTalk 22:48, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- We have moved away from that robotic repetition of the article's subject in the past half-year, most of those tallest-building FLs were promoted before. On your second point, no need to change it if it is consistent with others. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ah, I see. Well I've switched up the first paragraph quite a bit and added a few more bits into the lead. I hope this addresses your concern! --TorsodogTalk 02:49, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- We have moved away from that robotic repetition of the article's subject in the past half-year, most of those tallest-building FLs were promoted before. On your second point, no need to change it if it is consistent with others. Dabomb87 (talk) 02:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs)
- "second tallest overall structure"-->second-tallest overall structure
- "Overall, of the 25 tallest buildings and structures in Japan, 18 are
locatedin Tokyo." - "height limit of 31 metres until 1963 when " Comma after "1963".
- "in favor of a floor area ratio" Shouldn't it be "Floor Area Ratio"?
- "Doubling the height "-->Double the height
- "Tokyo is broken into two sections" I think "divided" would be better here.
- "are
locatedwithin" - "tallest free standing structure"-->tallest free-standing structure
- Add a note about the equal signs in the list, as in List of tallest buildings in Vancouver.
- "42th-tallest building in Japan"-->42nd-tallest building in Japan
- "42st-tallest building in Japan"-->42nd-tallest building in Japan Dabomb87 (talk) 14:32, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- All done! --TorsodogTalk 17:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sources
Quite a few of the sources need publisher information. Examples only: Refs 93, 95, 99, 100.Ref 104, addformat=PDF
to the citation template.
- Added PDF tags. Removed refs in question in favor of more reliable sources with publishers. --TorsodogTalk 17:11, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Excellent buildings list comparable to others. Reywas92Talk 01:47, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.