Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Listed buildings in Poulton-le-Fylde/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 18:24, 26 March 2011 [1].
Listed buildings in Poulton-le-Fylde (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): BelovedFreak 13:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This is a fairly short list of all the listed buildings in Poulton-le-Fylde, which I believe meets the FL criteria. It has benefited from some early advice from Peter I. Vardy, on whose Listed buildings in Runcorn (urban area) and Listed buildings in Runcorn (rural area) this list was modelled. It has also received a peer review by Brianboulton. There may be a problem with accessibility in the table which I haven't been able to fix on my own (see WT:Manual_of_Style_(accessibility)/Data tables tutorial# Sortability/unsortability and scope), so any advice there would be appreciated. --BelovedFreak 13:13, 26 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 17:40, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 21:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
- And I guess I'd sort "probably 18th C" before "mid-18th C".
- Could you give me a suggestion of when to sort the "probably"s to? At present they sort to eg. 1750, the same as the "mid-"s. I have a "probably early 18th century" sorting to 1710. It's messing with my head a bit now. --BelovedFreak 18:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd sort the "probably 18th C" to 1700. That is just my opinion though... Early stuff, would sort like you have... It's not critical. No major issue. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:41, 2 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Could you give me a suggestion of when to sort the "probably"s to? At present they sort to eg. 1750, the same as the "mid-"s. I have a "probably early 18th century" sorting to 1710. It's messing with my head a bit now. --BelovedFreak 18:53, 1 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from — Rod talk 09:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comment A few comments and questions.
In the lead:
Table
Images
I hope these comments are understandable?— Rod talk 11:09, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support Thanks for all your work. Maybe one day we will get to all the listed buildings!!!— Rod talk 09:35, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! I must admit I'm starting small, but it would be great to see that happen! --BelovedFreak 09:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments –
St Johns Chapel: Period needed after "The chapel is on one storey and has arched windows with timber Y-tracery".The Manor: Add "in" to "This house was built 1895."?Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:41, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Thanks for catching those! --BelovedFreak 09:42, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Note from Hassocks5489: I shall review this list in the next few days, once I return from a brief wikibreak. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 23:09, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 23:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Here are my comments and suggestions. A good, attractively presented list; all sorting, Google coordinates and references/links work correctly.
Some discussion of the interior timber-framing at 2 Market Place, which is a significant part of the list description, would be good; just a sentence or so, maybe. Likewise, a few words about the possibly late 17th-century staircase inside 25, 27, 29 and 31 Market Place, and the Jacobean interior of The Manor (staircase, gallery etc.). Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:28, 15 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Support. All of my comments have been addressed to a high standard. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 23:37, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! And thanks again for the tips on what to add. --BelovedFreak 09:47, 20 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Meets standards. No complaints from me. Courcelles 21:34, 23 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.