Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Municipalities of Nayarit/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC) [1].[reply]
Municipalities of Nayarit (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Mattximus (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Let's keep it going. Here is one more list of municipalities with a standardized format that now includes 45 (!!) lists in North America. Inspired by real encyclopedias with consistent formatting and high standards, I'm helping to achieve this for lists of municipalities. I tried to incorporate changes from previous nominations but I'm sure I've missed some and there can always be improvements. Thanks for your reviews Mattximus (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
edit- "Santiago Ixcuintla is third largest municipality by population." => "Santiago Ixcuintla is the third largest municipality by population."
- That's all I got! -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Nice catch! All done. Mattximus (talk) 18:11, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:31, 12 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
MPGuy2824
- There has to be a more urban-looking image for Compostela.
- I agree but there does not seem to be any. The urban area is quite tiny, and would be more of a town feel, which is perhaps why there are no images? Mattximus (talk) 14:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Since municipalities are the second-level administrative divisions in Mexico, it would be nice to get a map of Nayarit divided into its municipalities.
- Well I did my best at making my own map. It's not perfect, but does it do what you wanted? Mattximus (talk) 14:38, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
-MPGuy2824 (talk) 10:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Compostela image: The other municipality images in the list are urban. I think using the lead image of Compostela, Nayarit, instead of what is there now, would be better.
- Done
- Map of municipalities: Nice job. If you still have the svg file, then upload that as well, to commons. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:02, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I saved it as png unfortunately, however I realize an error, in that I didn't use the Spanish spelling (missing accents) on a few words. I suppose it's ok for English wikipedia, but I don't think I have time to redo it. Mattximus (talk) 15:10, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Support promotion. -MPGuy2824 (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dank
edit- Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
- Additional disclaimer: my Spanish is very poor.
- "West Mexico": The capital "W" means that there's a well-known area called "West Mexico" ... if so, please link "West Mexico" to a Wikipedia page that tells us what it is. If not, then use "western" instead of "West".
- "all the public services for their constituents": I'd shorten it to "all public services" (without "constituents"), unless I'm missing something.
- Checking the FLC criteria:
- 1. Nothing else is jumping out at me as a prose problem. I checked sorting on all sortable nonnumeric columns and sampled the links in the table.
- 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
- 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
- 3b. The sources appear to be reliable (but note my disclaimer), and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any significant problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
- 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, and it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find).
- 4. It is navigable.
- 5. It meets style requirements. At a glance, the images seem fine except for the last one; see below.
- 6. It is stable.
- I'll go ahead and support, but I recommend either removing the last image or doing some research on the validity of the license, since a banned sockpuppet uploaded it. - Dank (push to talk) 13:27, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm agreed with the reviewer above about looking for other images for Compostela. Your choice, but I agree with him that the lead image of Compostela, Nayarit, looks like it would work. And ping me sometime about whether there's a "West Mexico" or not. - Dank (push to talk) 12:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, switched picture, no problem. Should I write Pacific Mexico? I'm completely open to other wording! Thanks! Mattximus (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- In general, I stay away from discussions over what to call a geographic area ... but this is a different issue, it's about the capitalization. A proper noun means: "This is a thing. Maybe there's some disagreement over exactly what it is, but it's a definite thing, and this is what I think the name is". So, is West Mexico a thing? Is Pacific Mexico a thing? If so, then there's probably a paragraph somewhere on Wikipedia that tells you what that term means. If not, then it's best to avoid the proper noun. "western Mexico" means just "somewhere on the western side of Mexico". - Dank (push to talk) 15:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Sure, switched picture, no problem. Should I write Pacific Mexico? I'm completely open to other wording! Thanks! Mattximus (talk) 15:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm agreed with the reviewer above about looking for other images for Compostela. Your choice, but I agree with him that the lead image of Compostela, Nayarit, looks like it would work. And ping me sometime about whether there's a "West Mexico" or not. - Dank (push to talk) 12:52, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Right that makes sense. I did some poking around and there is a region in spanish called "Western Mexico" which contains this state. I used that term now, with proper capitalization. Thanks for the tip! Mattximus (talk) 16:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, but the phrase doesn't seem to exist (as an actual thing) on the English Wikipedia or in English-language dictionaries (that I can find), so I lowercased it. Everything looks good now. - Dank (push to talk) 17:44, 19 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Source review – Reference reliability looks okay and the new link-checker tool indicates no problems.
One formatting issues, albeit minor: ref 1 has a hyphen that should be converted into an en dash per the MoS.Giants2008 (Talk) 21:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]- Done! Mattximus (talk) 23:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Promoting. --PresN 19:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.