Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/NBA Finals Most Valuable Player Award
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by User:The Rambling Man 06:47, 28 July 2008 [1].
I am nominating with Chrishomingtang this article because we believe this is featured list material. Annoyomous24 21:17, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Many of the statements in the lead are not sourced with a ref.
- I will do that.—Chris! ct 00:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Add several refs.—Chris! ct 05:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I suggest stating how the recipient of the award is determined.
Already did.Oh, I am looking at another page. Not done yet.—Chris! ct 00:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]- Done.—Chris! ct 05:39, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I also suggest stating the amount of different players that have received the awards.
- I will add that.—Chris! ct 00:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- In the notes section, Because Tim Duncan is a United States citizen by birth, as are all natives of the U.S. Virgin Islands, he was able to played for the U.S. internationally., why is "played" in past tense?
- Fixed.—Chris! ct 00:41, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
SRX 23:06, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - my comments have been addressed.SRX 15:39, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Not keen on "PLAYER (X)" why not "Name (X)"? DONE!
- Why not make the table sortable? DONE!
- "until a smaller trophy was introduced in 2005." needs reference.
- Got it—Chris! ct 19:52, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Not keen on "(naturalized U.S. citizen since 1993)" - why not flow it in the prose rather than crowbar in a statement in parentheses? DONE!
- The Rambling Man (talk) 10:43, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- "The award was decided by a panel of 9 media members," -- "was" or "is"? If it's "was", then where is the bit about how it's decided now?
- DONE! -- K. Annoyomous24 10:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- "In at least one NBA Finals" this is too vague. Can it be tied down to a specific number?
- I don't know how to find the exact number but I wrote "some" instead of "at least one". -- K. Annoyomous24 10:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well I noticed the statement has two references. What do those say, because "some" is just as vague unfortunately. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 15:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The first reference is the most recent one, which doesn't have fan balloting. The second one which it the 2007 one does. So I really don't know. -- K. Annoyomous24 17:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I changed it back to "at least one" because that is the only fact we know based on the references. I know it is vague but at least it is better than "some" and is verifiable.—Chris! ct 17:47, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The first reference is the most recent one, which doesn't have fan balloting. The second one which it the 2007 one does. So I really don't know. -- K. Annoyomous24 17:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Well I noticed the statement has two references. What do those say, because "some" is just as vague unfortunately. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 15:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I'd like to see the image of the trophy moved to the lede section
- We can't do that as the NBA Awards template has to be the most uprighted thing on the article. -- K. Annoyomous24 10:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh. You could position it to the left, if it doesn't squash the text too much. I guess it's not a big deal. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 15:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I really do think it will squash it. I'll try it right now but I don't think it'll work. If it doesn't work, I won't reply. -- K. Annoyomous24 17:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Currently, I feel that the picture looks sort of bad. Lets just see what others think. -- K. Annoyomous24 17:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it looks bad, too.—Chris! ct 17:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Me too! :P Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 18:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, looks poor but since it exists, it must be used here really. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Changed it back! -- K. Annoyomous24 18:39, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeah, looks poor but since it exists, it must be used here really. The Rambling Man (talk) 18:38, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Me too! :P Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 18:32, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think it looks bad, too.—Chris! ct 17:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Currently, I feel that the picture looks sort of bad. Lets just see what others think. -- K. Annoyomous24 17:14, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I really do think it will squash it. I'll try it right now but I don't think it'll work. If it doesn't work, I won't reply. -- K. Annoyomous24 17:07, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh. You could position it to the left, if it doesn't squash the text too much. I guess it's not a big deal. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 15:41, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Is there anything for an EL section?
- There is none. -- K. Annoyomous24 10:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Where is the [edit] tab for the Winners section?
- To be honest, I don't know. -- K. Annoyomous24 10:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- I think the position of the template prevents the [edit] tab from appearing. That is my guess.—Chris! ct 17:51, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Where is the contents table?
- DONE! -- K. Annoyomous24 10:00, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
That's all I have, I think. Matthewedwards (talk • contribs • email) 08:48, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.