Comments
- "in the National Wrestling Alliance's" just "in the NWA's.."
- "Due to its history, it has been considered the most important title in EMLL/CMLL." is this specifically referenced, and more than once?
- Well it is listed as the most important EMLL/CMLL title in the general source, I've seen it stated at times when describing certain wrestlers winning the title when I've researched for their articles. I could find one or two specific mentions to go with the general reference. MPJ -DK 19:48, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Found two additional citations - one on Dixon mentioning he won the title "that would become the most important title in EMLL for many years" and Dr. Wagner won "the top title". That should cover it. MPJ -DK 07:35, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- "of a storyline.The" space needed.
- " Empressa Mexican de Lucha Libre (later renamed CMLL)" - first you've already abbreviated to EMLL and secondly you've already told us this was renamed.
- what are "booking rights"?
- Well to be honest they're "the rights to book title matches", but I changed it to the simpler term "control",
- "in the mid-1980s; From then" just "from" not "From" after the ;
- " El Texano, Jr's" needs a . after Jr to be consistent with the previous sentence.
- Entries with an en-dash need to sort as if they're zero.
- Mendoza seems to have a value for days held in the second table but not the first. Be consistent.
- It is consistent both with previous FLs and with the explanations in the key - one title reign does not have a precise date so in cumulative the lowest possible date is used to "err on the side of caution" for cumulative. Individual reigns with no definite length is a note and sorts by lowest date. It's the generally acceptable format for wrestling championship lists. MPJ -DK 19:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- So this list will be updated in 14 days when the current champ goes ahead of Raul Mata in the combined reign table?
- Well naturally the article will be updated when something changes, just like if someone else won the title or if it was abandoned, sold or anything else - normal Wikipedia maintenance.
The Rambling Man (talk) 19:00, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- "Championship vacated when Shocker left CMLL to join Asistencia Asesoría y Administración; he does not show up for a scheduled title defense[6]" why not "he did not appear in a scheduled title defense"? Or similar? And you need a period there.
- "<the championship " typo.
- Some notes have refs, some don't, some blank cells have refs, some don't, this appears a little strange to me.
- Well two notes need references because it's not covered by the reference provided in the table row or the general references for title history up until 2000, so those that need it have references. And as the general reference covers up until 2000 nothing before that needs an explicit source, everything after needs a source for the information on the title change, which is then placed in the "Notes" column, irregardles of there being a note or not. What you call strange is just sourcing the information.
- "The exact length of at least one title reign is uncertain, so the shortest possible length is used" that also applies in the first table where you have uncertain reigns, so the note should apply in both places.
- Not in the same form, a comment on why some lengths have "Notes" and not numbers could be needed and I can add that.
- Footnote 1 and the general footnote lack references.
- Footnote 1 has the reference in the text, next to the footnote, I could not make it work inside the footnote tag for some reason. I will reference the general one.
- Don't mix date formats in the references.
- What makes that external link "wrestling-titles.com" reliable?
The Rambling Man (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
|
