Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/National Film Award for Best Direction/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 23:32, 30 March 2018 (UTC) [1].[reply]
National Film Award for Best Direction (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Nominator(s): Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
My second National Film Award nomination. I feel its a well written and well sourced list worthy of promotion. As always, all the constructive comments and feedbacks are welcomed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
| Resolved comments from Jmnbqb (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
|---|
;Comments from Jmnbqb
Overall good job! If you get time, I could use a review on one of my listed FLCs. Jmnbqb (talk) 13:41, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Also need to add alt text to images per MOS:ACCESS. Other than that looks good! Jmnbqb (talk) 20:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments and support. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:10, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
| Resolved comments from BeatlesLedTV (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply] |
|---|
;Comments from BeatlesLedTV
Looks good. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 22:28, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
|
- Support – Looks good. Great job! BeatlesLedTV (talk) 14:44, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for your comments and support :) Yashthepunisher (talk) 15:05, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Support-Great job. My only comment is that Ref2 is dead. Just replace it and the list will be good to go — FR+ 06:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- FR, done as suggested, thanks for the comment and support. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:57, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source review
edit- You might want to check that "deadurl" field as yes if the link is dead as was the case of the first ref. Make sure all the links have been checked.
- Archived.
- Ref. 1 says that the awards were instituted in 1968, the article says it was 1967. Does ref. 2 say 1968? I haven't been able to look through the entire document so it would be helpful if you tell me where to look.
- The reference says: "Separate awards for artistes and technicians were instituted in 1968 for the films of 1967."
- Why does the url field in ref. 2 have the archived url? Also, is this ref of any use, I haven't been through the entire document?
- Removed, seemed unnecessary to me as well.
- Ref. 3 mentions Mukherjee, but does not say that the awards are presented by President in general.
- Fixed.
- Wikilink Outlook, Business Standard, The Asian Age and the likes.
- Done
- You might also want to be consistent with wiklinks in refs. You link International Film Festival of India on multiple occasions, but the rest only once. Either link only on first occurrence or link everywhere.
- Fixed. Yashthepunisher (talk) 14:22, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Going through the contents of the table, VedantTalk 09:27, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Further:
- I have to say Yash, I am fairly confused on how you've given the titles to the refs. 58th National Awards has a unique instance of the year mentioned in the title and none of the other do; the 64th National Awards pdf has the year in the title but the ref does not. You'll have to help me out here.
- The title of ref's are consistent now. Most of the references have year mentioned in them, but some don't have that. I don't think its necessary in any way.
- Also, I still think that the "deadurl" field in the refs issue has not been addressed. Most of the "original" URLs are dead and should say yes in theirrespective "deadurl" field as it is in the last ref. In that scenario the archived URL comes first which is ideal.
- Replaced dead urls.
They are all available and working in the archived forms otherwise. VedantTalk 16:03, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Numerounovedant I have hopefully resolved your comments now. Have a look. Yashthepunisher (talk) 13:06, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything looks good, but you've misunderstood me on the last point again. You do not have to change the URL with archived url as you did here. All you need to do is this, just replace the no with a yes. Other than that, consider the source review done. Good luck getting this promoted! VedantTalk 14:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Numerounovedant Done as suggested. Rest of the links are working. Is their anything else? Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. that should be it then. Consider this done. VedantTalk 05:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks for the review Vedant. Yashthepunisher (talk) 06:21, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Yes. that should be it then. Consider this done. VedantTalk 05:25, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Numerounovedant Done as suggested. Rest of the links are working. Is their anything else? Yashthepunisher (talk) 12:11, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Everything looks good, but you've misunderstood me on the last point again. You do not have to change the URL with archived url as you did here. All you need to do is this, just replace the no with a yes. Other than that, consider the source review done. Good luck getting this promoted! VedantTalk 14:22, 28 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Source review passed above, thanks Numerounovedant! Made one tweak- the date formats were mixed between DMY and MDY. Promoting. --PresN 21:45, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.