Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Philadelphia Phillies all-time roster (I–J)/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Dabomb87 21:32, 9 June 2011 [1].

Philadelphia Phillies all-time roster (I–J)

Featured list candidates/Philadelphia Phillies all-time roster (I–J)/archive1

Nominator(s): — KV5 • Talk • 23:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Next Phillies roster list nomination. The open "H" nomination has four supports and all comments appear to have been addressed satisfactorily. All comments expediently addressed. Cheers. — KV5 • Talk • 23:11, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

On my browser, the Ferguson Jenkins, Geoff Jenkins, Hughie Jennings, Todd Jones, and Buck Jordan photos overlap the ref column in the J table. Photos should be resized. Albacore (talk) 21:46, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The image widths are not forced, and should not be per MOS. This may mean that your image preferences are too large for your browser. The tables are only 65% width, more than sufficient. — KV5 • Talk • 22:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Images seem to be different sizes, I guess you're using thumb and thumb/upright but the upright ones are differing widths. Is this because of reduced resolution available on some of the images? Just looks a little odd/untidy to me. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

All of the above are correct. Some images are upright, and some are poor resolution. What do you suggest - removing the upright params and the small images? (I happen to think the Davey Johnson image adds a lot because it's hard to find pictures of players from the era, but of course I'm open to suggestions.) — KV5 • Talk • 00:47, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Ouch. A shame that we have images that are weaker in resolution that the upright parameter "argue" with. I guess you're complying with MOS, so there's no "technical" grounds for complaint! No worries then... The Rambling Man (talk) 21:39, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - I highly agree with you. I'm always on the lookout for more images, though, so hopefully eventually we will have enough good-quality pics to remove the LQ ones. — KV5 • Talk • 02:56, 14 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Support no traumas here. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:17, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment – Just a brief note that I didn't find anything to complain about in the list. Since my fellow director supported directly above me, I'll refrain from doing so this time to avoid any inconvenience when it comes time to close this FLC. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 23:26, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nothing to complain about. Courcelles 01:12, 21 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support You seem to be getting good at this! No issues from me. Harrias ^talk 10:10, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Support This will be a fantastic project when all is said and done. The ultimate style guide. Staxringold _talk^contribs 15:31, 8 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.