Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/United States presidential elections in Arizona/archive1

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by PresN via FACBot (talk) 00:27, 15 November 2021 (UTC) [1].[reply]

United States presidential elections in Arizona

Featured list candidates/United States presidential elections in Arizona/archive1

Nominator(s): Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am nominating this for featured list because I feel that these types of lists on United States presidential elections have a great potential to be FL. I almost completely re-formatted the list, added a lead, and key for political parties. It lists all the elections in which Arizona participated, with votes and percentage. I would respond to every comment, and try to bring this nomination to FL standards whenever needed. With one of the list (United States presidential elections in Alaska) currently a FLC, with a support, and reviewer's concerns have been substantially addressed, I nominate this too. Thanks! (45 states more to go) – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:58, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from ChrisTheDude

"William Howard Taft was on the fourth position" => "William Howard Taft finished fourth" or "William Howard Taft finished in fourth position", but not what you have currently (same in note b)
Is there any way to avoid having four consecutive sentences starting with "In the 19xx presidential election"?
"Since the 1952 presidential election, Arizona was considered" => "Since the 1952 presidential election, Arizona has been considered"
Notes c and d need full stops
That's what I got -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 21:01, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @ChrisTheDude – Done all. Thanks again! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:22, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 15:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from RunningTiger123

Two small things:

Given its notability, it might be worth linking 2021 Maricopa County presidential ballot audit somewhere in the lead. (Of course, we also have a lot of coverage of the 2020 election in the lead, so if it can't be noted in just a few words, it might be better to keep it out.)
"recent political realignment led to Arizona becoming a swing state" → "recent political realignment has led some to consider Arizona as a swing state" (hedges a bit, but one election probably isn't enough to determine long-term trends)

— RunningTiger123 (talk) 03:07, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@RunningTiger123 Done the second one, left the first point, as we already have lot about 2020. Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:17, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support – RunningTiger123 (talk) 17:46, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 10:21, 31 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Comments from Reywas92

Like Alaska, start the article with its topic, it doesn't need to be pointed out what region the state is in.
- Removed. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"percentage of vote share" is redundant since vote share is implied to be a percentage.
- Removed 'percentage' – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"by 42.92%" implies a margin so "a margin of" is superfluous.
- Removed 'a margin of' – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reywas92^Talk 14:25, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Reywas92 – Done, thanks again! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:36, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Reywas92 – Just a courtesy ping. – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 11:26, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Support Reywas92^Talk 14:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Image review pass

The only image (File:Arizona_in_United_States.svg) is an original work with the copyright released by the creator. Dugan Murphy (talk) 23:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 05:03, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Promoting. --Pres N 13:51, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.

@PresN – May I just bring to your notice that this has been promoted without a formal Source review. Now, in various other lists which you promoted without an source review, you mentioned that "Source review pass, promoting". Is that the same case here? Thanks anyways! – Kavyansh.Singh (talk) 14:01, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, yeah, I did check the sources before promoting. --Pres N 14:34, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.