Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Venues of the 1952 Winter Olympics/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Dabomb87 16:10, 17 September 2011 [1].
Venues of the 1952 Winter Olympics (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): Arsenikk (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I believe the list meets the criteria. It is closely related to the existing FL Venues of the 1994 Winter Olympics. Arsenikk (talk) 21:02, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Check the overlinking of the place names like Oslo etc. Format tables per WP:ACCESS. — Legolas (talk2me) 11:13, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Thank you for the comments. Regarding overlinking, repeating of links is permitted within tables, per Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style_(linking)#Repeated links. Outside the tables and caption, I believe there are no links which are repeated (if you see any, please tell me). Regarding the latter, could you be specific about what part of WP:ACCESS you feel is being violated. I have read the guideline without finding any violations, and I have had the same structure to previous tables previously at FL without any feedback, so I would very much like to know how I can improve accessibility. Arsenikk (talk) 17:10, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- I would tend to agree that the linking in the tables is reasonable as-is. –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:13, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from –Drilnoth (T/C) 19:58, 15 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
*Why do only three venues in the first section have a capacity listed? –Drilnoth (T/C) 21:15, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments –
|
- Support – Meets FL standards. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 00:03, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Resolved comments from The Rambling Man (talk) 11:35, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comments
The Rambling Man (talk) 20:45, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
|
Resolved comments from NapHit (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply] |
---|
Comment
|
- Support Just for future reference you need to have an exclamation mark instead of a pipe when you use scope. Anyway Great work. NapHit (talk) 20:18, 8 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Support No outstanding issues as far as I can see. Miyagawa (talk) 20:50, 10 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.