Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Willowtip Records discography

The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.

The list was promoted by Matthewedwards 01:00, 25 February 2009 [1].

Willowtip Records discography

Nominator(s): Canniba loki

Featured list removal candidates/Willowtip Records discography/archive1

I am nominating this list because it is mostly based on the discographies of Dischord Records and Load Records, as both were promoted to featured list status (model and source of "respiration"). This is the first list containing only extreme metal bands which at least reached this page ("gangrenik" grammar). I chose not putting it on peer review, because its content is very short, and we don't need lose time with this. I think it is ready to receive comments, of course. Canniba loki 05:54, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved comments from Truco

Comments from Truco (talk · contribs) - pretty good list overall, but

Lead

The lead should be expanded further to summarize the list more, such as the first/most recent releases, and other significant releases.
- Done.--Canniba loki 03:52, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - This was not done.--<TRUCO> ⁵⁰³ 22:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - How not?--Canniba loki 14:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - I still don't see a summary of the list.--<TRUCO> ⁵⁰³ 15:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        What is missing?--<Cannibaloki> ⁶⁶⁶ 15:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        What's missing? Well for (1)The right to use my signature =P (2)I see a significant release, but not the first or most recent one listed.--<TRUCO> ⁵⁰³ 15:50, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        I see you in court! Done.--Canniba loki 17:57, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Catalog

Do the 'split' albums have official names? In addition, why aren't these capitalized?
- No. Done.
The Co-releases column name isn't really descriptive of the column, can it be renamed in a way to state that the 'album' was co-released with such record.
- Co-released albums? I think a note explaining this will be better, in any way I have explained about the co-releases in the text saying: Willowtip Records has also co-released records with labels, such as Earache Records, Candlelight Records, and Neurotic Records.--Canniba loki 02:56, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - But the title of the column really isn't saying that, which is why I am asking whether it can be titled in a different manner?--<TRUCO> ⁵⁰³ 22:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
    - Co-labels?--Canniba loki 14:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - That would work perfectly.--<TRUCO> ⁵⁰³ 15:19, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
        Done.--Canniba loki 15:37, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
In my opinion the note at the top and bottom of the table should be in a key at the top, it would be a better format.
- Done. I put on the bottom of the table.

Notes

All the notes aren't complete sentences, and thus are not subject to a period. In addition, the commas before limited to ___ copies should be semi-colon. The best option would be to make them complete sentences IMO.
- Done.
In this context, its improper to start the notes with the word Also.--<TRUCO> ⁵⁰³ 22:46, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- ~~Doing...~~ Canniba loki 23:14, 12 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Done.
    - The last 2 notes need full stops.--<TRUCO> ⁵⁰³ 22:26, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
      - Done.--Canniba loki 14:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support - (1) problems resolved to meet WP:WIAFL. ~~(2)IMO an external link to the official website should be added.~~ (3)Court date is tomorrow =P.<TruCo> ⁵⁰³ 18:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay. Done. I will be busy, how about 31 February 2009? =D <Cannibaloki> ⁶⁶⁶ 18:42, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - Perfect, see you then lol.--<TruCo> ⁵⁰³ 18:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support, all issues resolved. Dabomb87 (talk) 04:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Resolved issues, Dabomb87 (talk)
Comments from Dabomb87 (talk · contribs) "from several ~~different~~ countries" Done. "The label first releases"-->The label's first releases Done. "from 52 ~~different~~ artists." Done. The image caption needs a period at the end. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply] Done. Canniba loki 17:40, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sources look good. Dabomb87 (talk) 15:52, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Support Looks very nice, so I'm happy to support immediately. Only one minor suggestion: I'd take out the last sentence of the lead ("Since its foundation, Willowtip has released 72 albums from 52 artists.") It's something that would require constant updating as the label releases more and more, and therefore it's prone to be out of date. I don't think the sentence is necessary, so I'd just take it out to avoid the hassle. Otherwise, great work! Drewcifer (talk) 06:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done. Thanks!--Canniba loki 15:50, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And one other thing I noticed: "Split" isn't the name of anything, so it should be lowercase, not uppercase. Drewcifer (talk) 18:48, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done.--Canniba loki 18:59, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments - Is there a reason to not make the table sortable? Being able to find the albums alphabetically, or see all of a groups releases next to each other would be helpful. If made sortable, i would support. If free images exist for some of the bands, might be a nice addition down the side of the table (I use larger than standard fonts, and there is still enough space). The list of bands at the parent article should be a see also now.Yobmod (talk) 10:13, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a specific rule? Canniba loki 15:01, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.