Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Carrie Underwood discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Dabomb87 03:38, 12 April 2010 [1].
Carrie Underwood discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- Featured list candidates/Carrie Underwood discography/archive1
- Featured list candidates/Carrie Underwood discography/archive2
| Toolbox |
|---|
Notified: User:Caldorwards4, User:Eric444, User:I7114080, Wikipedia:WikiProject Music. Another editor contributed significantly but retired in February 2009.
I am nominating this for featured list removal because… wow, there're a ton of issues.
- Verifiability and sourcing
- The Canadian country singles peaks aren't verified by any of the sources.
- "B-sides and unreleased songs" has only one source which doesn't even verify the info cited to it.
- "Miscellaneous appearances" is entirely unsourced.
- The music video table is also unsourced.
- Reliability
- Source 2 is top40charts.com, which has been deemed unreliable in the past.
- Is source 3 (realitytvworld.com) reliable?
- Reference 4 (RIAA database) says "No results found for your search."
- Can we use iTunes links as sources?
- Prose and other
- RIAA should be spelled out in full on its first use.
- There is also a major WP:WIAFL #6 concern, as IPs are fond of changing chart positions without sources.
Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 00:17, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove I can see there's a ton of issues and unless they can be fixed this shouldn't be featured. --Caldorwards4 (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove. On top of the issues listed above, Chart Stats is used as a source. Goodraise 22:11, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Why is Chart Stats a problem? Can you recommend a better source? Langdon (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- It is a problem, because I don't see how it identifies as a reliable source. As for alternatives, Music Week and ChartsPlus spring to mind. Goodraise 03:47, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove I have fixed some problems but there is more to be done, especially the lead. Langdon (talk) 01:34, 1 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.