Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Natasha Bedingfield discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by Dabomb87 15:09, 7 August 2010 [1].
Natasha Bedingfield discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
- Notified: Underneath-it-All
Lead does not satisfy WP:LEAD, albums and singles positions not sourced. Miscellaneous, music videos, and DVD's not sourced. Several problems, speedy remove. Candyo32 18:53, 21 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Remove – I'm not going to call for this to be speedily removed, since there's always the possibility that someone will come around and make improvements. However, I also notice the issues with the lead and shortage of references, and the general referencing that is in place doesn't inspire much confidence; Everyhit and aCharts have been questioned numerous times before. There's also a dead link and a disambiguation link, as far as cleanup goes. Giants2008 (27 and counting) 22:24, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'm failing to recognise the mentioned flaws. Maybe I'm missing something about what exacly you want to delete here but if there are smaller flaws in the discography page I would rather ask you to fix it instead of spending time on a delete discussion. Most of the entries seem to besourced, however it is difficult on these tables not to pass into WP:OVERLINKING (sorry, no sign within englich WP: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Peter.dittmann)--84.174.128.220 (talk) 20:51, 27 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Please note that this is not a deletion discussion. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- This is not a deletion discussion, it is a de-listing discussion because virtually everything in the singles, miscellaneous, and music videos is unsourced, and the lead is insufficient. Candyo32 16:37, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- I made a start bit frankly this does require a lot of work something which at the moment I am unable to do though I would hope that I am able to in the future. But in the mean time unless someone else takes it on I'd delist. --Lil-unique1 (talk) 23:03, 3 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist. Some work's been done, but per above a lot more is needed yet. Wizardman Operation Big Bear 16:08, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist inadequate lead, internal inconsistencies, severe lack of references e.g. in the videos section, compare to any recently promoted discog, this is sorely lacking, and not our finest work. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:23, 5 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.