Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/Wilco discography/archive1
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list removal nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was removed by The Rambling Man 16:21, 27 February 2011 [1].
Wilco discography (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
| Toolbox |
|---|
Nominated in 2007, lack of referencing to verify the information in many of the sections, also appears to have dead external links and lead issues. Afro (Talk) 05:45, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comments
- Weak lead.
- References in a mess (mixed date formats, incomplete formatting etc)
- Not in-line with WP:DISCOGS (which isn't particularly important to me, but to the discography people it probably should be.
- Would expect to see an infobox in the lead.
- Dead/suspect links.
- Last collaboration has no information or reference.
- EPs section unreferenced.
- B-sides section unreferenced.
- Many Miscellaneous entries unreferenced.
- Videography entirely unreferenced.
- Download listings seem a little unusual for DISCOGS.
- Several WP:MOS issues in the refs.
In serious need of work. Currently delist. The Rambling Man (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist per above.-- ♫Greatorangepumpkin♫ T 20:04, 21 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Hang on I'll try to bring this up to snuff. Hopefully, 2–3 weeks will do. Can't make any promises though.—indopug (talk) 08:51, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, good news indopug. We will need to see evidence of it improving over the next fortnight, but your support in the process is very much appreciated. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:34, 23 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Update Here's the work done so far. Will resume working on it shortly.—indopug (talk) 06:36, 7 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Indopug, I see no further edits in the past fortnight, can you indicate where you are with the comments above? The Rambling Man (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry TRM, the amount of dedicated work required to bring this up to snuff is a little beyond me as of now.—indopug (talk) 16:00, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delist for now, stubby lead, iffy tables and underciting. Adabow (talk · contribs) 08:29, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.