Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/63 Building

63 Building

Reason: A great picture of the 63 Building in Seoul, South Korea. Its coppery geometry stands out beneath an overcast sky, instilling a sense of awe.
Articles this image appears in: Seoul, 63 Building
Creator: IGEL
Nominator: Hús ö nd

Support — Hús ö nd 01:56, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Neato, but I must Oppose. Overcast lighting it not the best way to show it off, composition cuts off the base and provides very little sense of scale. The only way I can tell how big it is is by counting floors. Also seems uniformly a little out of focus. --Dgies 02:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - In general, overcast lighting is going to make the photo subject less attractive. Also, the clutter at the bottom and the dim building in the back takes attention away from the subject. This would be a great picture had it been taken in better light conditions. Nilington 04:09 28 December 2006 UTC
Oppose Maybe if you would step back a little bit and wait untill a day that has better weather. --¿Why 1 9 9 1 ^{ESP. | Sign Here} 04:15, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree with the above user about the weather, and personally i think the street lamps at the bottom are eye sores. If there were trees or blurred cars or something that would be better.User:Voshvoshka - Dec 27, 22:26
Oppose In addition to all that, aliasing all over the place. ~ trialsanderrors 08:14, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Moderate Oppose; the weather in the picture will turn people off. A good shot, nonetheless. Do it in fine weather and you may get my support. -- Alt iris Exeunt 10:16, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per rampant aliasing. Needs to be at least 130% that resolution. --⁪froth^{T C} 22:17, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per reasons stated above. —sd31415 (sign here) 23:28, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per above. --Tewy 01:47, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Per above, defiantly not featured material. — Arjun 02:48, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Oppose Not exactly FP material. It is couldy, the resolution isn't that great, and the picture isn't that inspiring. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 20:10, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --KFP (talk | contribs) 16:47, 4 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]