Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Red eyed tree frog edit2.jpg

Agalychnis callidryas

Original - Adult specimen of Agalychnis callidryas displaying its bright side markings

Edit 2 - A different crop into 4:3, else same as Edit 1 by Mfield

Reason: High resolution (6 megapixel), encyclopedic image of Agalychnis callidryas. DOF isn't perfect, but lots of wow factor. Not currently featured anywhere, as far as I know.
Articles this image appears in: Agalychnis callidryas, Wildlife of Costa Rica, Red-eyed Tree Frog, Tourism in Costa Rica
Creator: Careyjamesbalboa

Support as nominator Edit 2 --Kaldari (talk) 20:23, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
~~Support~~ Support Edit 2 Cool. Although I wish that person's face wasn't in the photo. smooth0⁷0₇ (talk) 23:29, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Papa Lima Whiskey (talk) 23:53, 13 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Face is a minor annoyance but diffused enough so as not to distract Capital photographer (talk) 08:49, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Excellent detail. — BRIAN0918 • 2008-07-14 13:49Z
Support Great color and detail. Fletcher (talk) 15:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Not really sharp at full resolution, but still a good picture. —αἰτίας •discussion• 21:47, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support ~~Edit1~~Edit 2 Added Edit 1 to address problem of distracting faces in background and slight selective sharpen on frog as well. Mfield (talk) 21:55, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I def. like how you removed the faces and the other improvements, but I liked when the frog was at the center of the photo. Perhaps some of the left should be cropped as well. smooth0⁷0₇ (talk) 01:26, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think he was trying to preserve the original aspect ratio (2:3). I would suggest either being less severe with the crop or changing to a 3:4 aspect ratio. Kaldari (talk) 01:36, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Here you go - Edit 2 is 4:3, I think I prefer it too. Mfield (talk) 01:52, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Support edit 2 Gets it right. :) Durova^Charge! 05:38, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2 The composition, the use of color, the detail, and the encyclopedic content makes it a good FP. Palladmial (talk) 15:04, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- User has <15 edits --Fir0002 01:29, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2 Subject isn't tiny, nice detail, high quality image. TALKIN PIE EATER REVIEW ME 16:22, 15 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2 they're all good, but this edit's the best.Becky Sayles (talk) 00:48, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support edit 2 - great picture and edit, very encyclopedic. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:00, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Greener Cactus (talk) 20:20, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support any of them. very striking and vivid picture! Intothewoods29 (talk) 23:14, 18 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted Image:Red eyed tree frog edit2.jpg MER-C 04:12, 20 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]