Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Arnisee lake

Reason: A beautiful, Outstanding, High quality picture!
Articles this image appears in: Compression artifact, Overexposure, Ugly, Random article
Creator: I dunno...

Strong oppose as nominator — ^8thstar 18:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support The picture is not FP quality. I don't even think it is very good quality. In my opinion, it is too bright and low-resolution. It is also not pleasing to the eye and cannot be considered Wikipedia's best work.Wwicki 18:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Somebody's in the wrong timezone... —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 09:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Per AFD. _└^Jared_┘^┌_talk^┐ 18:59, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per above Jellocube27 19:14, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Needs more tilt. ~ trialsanderrors 19:44, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- It needs more cowbell... ^8thstar 20:29, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose it has more artifacts than king tut's tomb. -Fcb981 21:06, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I'd be an (April) fool not to support work of this quality. Possibly the finest pic ever put up for FP. Well done, let's have more like this. Lovely colour, very good focus and highly encyclopedic. - Adrian Pingstone 21:55, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Neutral per myself. --Bridgecross 01:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support - one of Fir0002's finest works. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξ φ 09:36, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
In the end, it would become a FP! Strong Oppose (But also Strong Support :)
Vehement neutral. I am throughly uncommitted to voting either way. — BRIAN0918 • 2007-04-02 19:52Z
Super support. Automatic promotion to FP! :D^8thstar

Closed, it's April 3rd now, move along --Dschwen 12:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]