Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Autoroute Ville-Marie

Autoroute Ville-Marie

Autoroute Ville-Marie just outside of downtown Montréal.

This picture appears in Freeway and Autoroute Ville-Marie. The picture is beautifully shot, with excellent composition and framing. It exemplifies the urban freeway design that appears in many major cities. The picture was taken on May 28, 2005 and uploaded by me on March 9, 2006.

Self-Nominate and support. - V8roadster 17:47, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Though I should warn, Image:I-80 Eastshore Fwy.jpg is already a featured pic. Coffee 18:55, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Picture is very well framed, I agree with the summary. It is slightly similar to Image:I-80 Eastshore Fwy.jpg but this picture depicts a trench freeway and not a surface-level one. Also, the goal of the above-mentioned Eastshore Freeway picture is to show the frontage roads abutting the freeway. Also, there are many similar featured pictures (say, of panoramas) that can coexist because the subject of the photograph is different. I think this is a good example of that. Job very well done. Charles2-2 19:35, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This is User:Charles2-2's first edit. Coffee 20:21, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Good encyclopedic contribution to its article but I much prefer our existing freeway FP ~ Veledan • Talk 21:11, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support Nice image, but the existing FP image is better. Alvinrune ^TALK 21:18, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Didn't anybody notice the sky? ~MDD 46 96 22:48, 10 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Agree with above. --Dante Alighieri | Talk 02:23, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, sky totally blown. --Janke | Talk 06:47, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose ack janke --vineeth 07:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose, the sky is inadequate, as well there is already a very similar featuerd picture. Phoenix2 20:30, 11 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The sky is no deal for me, its fine. But it's not that stunning. Kinda dull if you ask me. --J @red ^[T]/_[+] 16:59, 12 March 2006 (UTC
Oppose Just not interesting - Adrian Pingstone 17:04, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Per Adrian Pingstone - Glaurung 06:53, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted ~ Veledan • Talk 18:33, 24 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]