Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Blood values - by molarity 2
- Reason
- The needed edits in last nomination (Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Blood values - by molarity are now done, and all the values are referenced in the main article (reference ranges for blood tests).
- Articles this image appears in
- Reference ranges for blood tests, and some of the substances linked from there,
- Creator
- User:Mikael Häggström
- Support as nominator. Although there exists a similar one that already is featured (Image:Reference ranges for blood tests - by mass.png, I see no reason not to have another one featured, just as there are many featured images of birds. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose for the same reason as the removed/replaced nom: because we have a practically identical one already featured, the only difference is measuring by molarity vs. mass. I don't think we have two FPs of the same bird, taken 3 seconds or 30 cm apart... and if we have, one of them should be delisted. ;-) --Janke | Talk 19:30, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose as above. If molarity is more commonly used, perhaps this image should replace the other as FP. Muhammad(talk) 20:06, 7 December 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. This is like taking a picture of the same bird, but from a different angle. I've no reason to oppose on that ground. However, this one contains much less of the information available in the version describing mass ranges. Mostlyharmless (talk) 05:25, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
- Comment; It is true that substances are less commonly measured by molarity, and that explains why there are less ones in this one. Still, however, there are several substances included here that are not seen in that mass one, since they are usually measured by molarity only. Mikael Häggström (talk) 18:18, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted . --John254 00:45, 13 December 2008 (UTC)