Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Brigade combat team

A very cool image I found surfing Army news releases, quite high res and stunning IMO. Staxringold 00:34, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nominate and support. Staxringold 00:39, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Support. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. The only article this picture is used in is a stub. Plus - it is not a good illustration for that article either. I do not think this picture is of high value for an encyclopedia. Mikeo 11:05, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've added it to Camp Shelby (where the unit was departing from) and the "Field marching" subsection of Marching band, as although it is not a marching band it very clearly shows field marching (making shapes on the field with large numbers of people). Staxringold 11:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Unless Camp Shelby consists of a field of grass and not much more, this doesn't do a good job of pictorially representing it. Also, as you say, it doesn't illustrate the article content of the marching band article as they aren't a band. It is an impressive feat to pull off, but I have to agree with Mikeo. I hope they didn't spend all their time learning how to do field marching; this would make a rather poor combat formation. :)—WAvegetarian•_{_{CONTRIBUTIONS}}^{^TALK}• ^{^EMAIL}• 20:36, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - rather plain... -- P199 20:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Hard to tell for sure those are people except at the highest resolution. --Lewk_of_S e rthic _contrib ^talk 00:00, 9 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted Mikeo 11:32, 15 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]