Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Canton of Glarus, Switzerland
- Reason
- Breath taking, the image was taken during the exact right time.
- Articles this image appears in
- Canton of Glarus, Klöntalersee
- Creator
- Ikiwaner
- Support as nominator - Milk's Favorite Cookie 03:20, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful image with encyclopedic value!--Mbz1 (talk) 03:30, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose easily reproduced image that should be retaken when the hillsides are sunlit rather than 70% in the shade (or with more
diffuse lighting, the contrast between sun/shade detracts from the image IMO). Cacophony (talk) 03:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose per above --Mike Spenard (talk) 05:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Support Great picture, and I think the light/dark bit is a good picure split. Although the darker bits need to be lightened up just a tad. Otherwise great. Dengero (talk) 07:51, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- SupportThe darkness doesn't detract at all, from what I can see, and the split actually adds the "pop" that I need. Dr. eXtreme 14:50, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Support Nice image. —αἰτίας •discussion• 18:26, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose - lighting, per Cacophony. Mangostar (talk) 23:24, 6 March 2008 (UTC)
- Moderate support This is a very nice image, but the lighting is a small issue. If you have a photo program, you can adjust the lighting, but if you don't I'd be happy to do it for you, because I would like to see this as an FP. Juliancolton The storm still blows... 13:03, 7 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose A nice thumbnail, but when I expanded it ... it wasn't anything special. crassic\talk 18:42, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- support Yahel Guhan 07:43, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- Moderate oppose Good illustration of a Swiss lake in winter (you can feel the chill) and excellent encyclopedic in that it has supported the article since its inception. However the problems are the weak tree to the bottom left and the positioning of the clouds. They would be better to the left where they would lighten up that side and give a reflection, instead of overblowing the light bit to the right (IMHO). Motmit (talk) 10:43, 13 March 2008 (UTC)
Not promoted --Malachirality (talk) 18:17, 13 March 2008 (UTC)