Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Celosia
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 4 Aug 2011 at 06:40:50 (UTC)
- Reason
- High EV, good capture showing good detail of the unique flower.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Celosia cristata, Celosia
- FP category for this image
- Nature
- Creator
- Anupam
- Support as nominator --Hariya1234 (talk) 06:40, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose Subject is OOF, nothing special... ■ MMXX talk 12:54, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose agree with Mmxx, subject is OOF. Pine (was GreenPine) talk 21:18, 26 July 2011 (UTC)
- Weak oppose It’s a very good photo, it catches the weaves and folds of the plant’s head beautifully and is very well placed in the article. I think it comes very close to FP credibility: however, some of the plant’s head (particularly to the right) is out-of-focus. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TehGrauniad (talk • contribs) 00:04, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- 'Comment' Thanks a lot for feedback guys, I think I'll have to re-click! Hariya1234 (talk) 03:55, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
— Preceding unsigned comment added by Hariya1234 (talk • contribs) 04:05, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Oppose (not to be negative...you do way more than I do.) FYI, I actually like that pic stuck down in gallery better for EV and even as a picture.TCO (reviews needed) 05:25, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- 'Comment' In that case, the original image should be re-instated. Hariya1234 (talk) 07:38, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
- I meant I liked this pic [1] better. Now squashed down into gallery at the very bottom, it is the shot that tells me what the plant actually looks like a bit more. Should be up in the article somewhere, even if you use a "head shot" for the lead. I'm kind of down on our tight cropped bloom pictures. It would be one thing if they accompanied decent plant pics, but I really think they are leading to an attitude of pretty snapshot over EV illusttration or even thinking the plant is the flower.TCO (reviews needed) 14:53, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 02:26, 4 August 2011 (UTC)