Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Desiccation

Edit 1 - sharpened. Samsara (talk • contribs)

Reason: It caught my eye, it's got cool patterns, it is of high quality, and is of encyclopediatic value.
Articles this image appears in: desiccation, sludge
Creator: User:Hgrobe

Support as nominator TheOtherSiguy (talk) 23:51, 25 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Support Are you certain this isn't an aerial shot of a suburban subdivision? ;) Durova^Charge! 04:08, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Oppose Poor sharpness at 100% and not a particularly breathtaking subject to overcome this. --Fir0002 11:33, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak oppose. Nice picture, but nothing to provide a sense of scale. How large are these desiccation cracks? IronGargoyle (talk) 17:52, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Can I borrow you to say that again some time? Scale is a rather neglected aspect around here imho. Samsara (talk • contribs) 08:10, 27 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Gargoyle. Clegs (talk) 23:51, 26 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose; it's not interesting enough, nor is it of much encyclopedic value. -- Altiris Helios Exeunt 08:48, 28 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support, I agree with IronGargoyle that scale would be nice, but its really not the subject. It's dessication which can happen at various scales so it doesn't make it any less encyclopedic. gren グレン 06:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 06:40, 1 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]