Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Drottningholm Palace

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 5 Nov 2019 at 09:10:37 (UTC)

Original – Drottningholm Palace

Alternate – From the same photographer.

Reason: The Drottningholm Palace is the private residence of the Swedish royal family. (See also The baroque garden at Drottningholm Palace)
Articles in which this image appears: Drottningholm Palace
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: ArildV

Support either as nominator – --- Coffeeandcrumbs 09:10, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - harsh lighting. The infobox image is better in this regard. MER-C 10:52, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak support alternative. I would, of course, prefer an image that has the composition of the first but the lighting of the second. MER-C 14:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak Support~~ I think that a levels adjustment is called for. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.2% of all FPs} 02:52, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@MER-C and Adam Cuerden: Added alternate we can replace on the article. A head-on photo, as close to the palace as the alternate, is not possible because the area between the fountain and the palace is restricted. Both of these photos are FP at Commons and I don't want to mess with the levels on the original. The original is a panorama that has been stitched together. When I tried adjusting the levels, the right side turned out much darker than the left. --- Coffeeandcrumbs 07:12, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support – prefer Alternate, it can replace the infobox image. Bammesk (talk) 15:20, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Alt looks a little tilted. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.2% of all FPs} 18:53, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There is no tilt in the bottom horizontal lines of the building. The top horizontal lines have a slight tilt because the camera isn't positioned in the front center of the building. That kind of tilt is evident in real life too (expected), if one stood there, so I don't think it's a significant drawback, it is a natural phenomena given the camera position. Another way of saying it is: the left side of the building is closer to the camera, the right ride of the building is farther from the camera, so the left side of the building should appear larger than the right side, and it does. Bammesk (talk) 19:13, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

True. I guess I can Weak support either, which you may combine with MER-C's to get a full support. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 7.2% of all FPs} 08:49, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

None of the images has enough support for promotion. Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 14:59, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]