Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eureka Tower

Eureka Tower

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 27 Sep 2012 at 02:30:03 (UTC)

Original – The Eureka Tower in Melbourne, Australia, as viewed from Rialto Towers.

Reason: Large size, crisp image. Has high EV showing one of the tallest buildings in Australia and residential buildings in the world. Featured on German Wikipedia.
Articles in which this image appears: Eureka Tower, List of tallest residential buildings in the world, Grocon
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
Creator: Diliff

Support as nominator --Chris857 (talk) 02:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support I had thought about nominating this previously but I forgot about it. Pine^✉ 04:11, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Alborzagros (talk) 08:25, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom... Quick Question however - what are the golden flies/wasps near the base for? Is that a permanant feature or a temporary art installation? gazhiley 08:42, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't find anything that explicitly said, but "Queen Bee @ Eureka Tower" states that "Katsalidis and Stringer had discussed the idea of making a permanent installation on various building projects over the years and the image of a Queen Bee and colony had a obvious conceptual compatibility to the context of this gigantic residential tower." That makes me think it is permanent (and it is still there in a 2010 Google streetview image). {{commons:template:FoP-Australia}} says that permanent sculpture is FoP. Should a mention be added to the description page? Chris857 (talk) 16:30, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's de minimis anyway- nothing to worry about from a copyright perspective. J Milburn (talk) 19:45, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I don't have any concerns about copyright Mr Milburn - but I agree with Chris that something should be added to the description or even the actual page itself as there is nothing to explain it. It's too distinctive a feature in my opinion to be ignored, and if Chris is correct that it's a permanant thing then would be nice to be mentioned. Thank you Chris857 for your detective work! gazhiley 08:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Proper execution as far as I can tell. Good point of view, sharp, nice (presumed) stitching. Wish all my panorama have this many vertical guidelines ;) - Blieusong (talk) 17:39, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the whole panorama. File:Melbourne Skyline from Rialto Crop - Nov 2008.jpg. Chris857 (talk) 01:39, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for this link - surprise surprise another FP by Dillif... Anyone would think he's good at this photography malarky....... gazhiley 08:59, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, he puts all of us WP photographers to shame... --Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 20:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, nice panorama.--Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 20:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Support Pretty good. Dusty777 17:44, 18 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Mediran ^talk 10:45, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom.--Wingtipvorte^X PTT ∅ 20:04, 19 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Per supporters above. Alborzagros (talk) 13:46, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Support Tomer T (talk) 14:21, 23 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Promoted File:Eureka Tower, Melbourne - Nov 2008.jpg --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:44, 27 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]