Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Female Pubic Hair

Reason
Good quality image showing female pubic hair
Articles this image appears in
Pubic hair
Creator
Kma922


The image is about pubic hair, not about nudity. It focuses on pubic hair. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 09:21, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Placing in hide box, see Wikipedia_talk:Featured_picture_candidates#Nude_images :D\=< (talk) 09:27, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Oppose subject is no where near in focus. de Bivort 15:15, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Oppose This, while it is fine on its own article, should not be featured and listed among wikipedia's best imagery. Juliancolton (Talk) 19:09, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close. As an illustration of pubic hair, far too little space is devoted to the primary subject. As a photograph of a woman, obvious problems with cut-off face (get a photograph of the model holding a signed release and show the entire face). Flat lighting, pedestrian composition. DurovaCharge! 20:46, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • Speedy close as ineligible - not in any article. It was in the gallery of pubic hair for about 14 hours before being reverted. I think it should be seen to settle into an article and receive concensus as being beneficial to that article for a while before being even considered for nomination as an FP. TSP (talk) 01:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 03:50, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wheres the picture?