Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Ferrari P4/5 by Pininfarina

Ferrari P4/5 by Pininfarina

The Ferrari P4/5 is a one-off custom car built on the chasis of the Enzo Ferrari, as a modern representation of Ferrari P prototype cars. The car is owned by James Glickenhaus and was modified by Pininfarina at a cost of US$4 million.

Reason: Very little FP's of cars. The image mainly focuses of the P4/5.
Articles this image appears in: Enzo Ferrari (car), Ferrari P, Pininfarina, Ferrari P4/5
Creator: Lennart
Nominator: 293.xx.xxx.xx

As mentioned by other noters below, light is a problem and it just does not seem to be good enough for a featured image. Tellyaddict 17:40, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comment put you votes at the end of the list. also there is no need to have it all in headline text. -Fcb981 01:52, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Support — 293.xx.xxx.xx 06:21, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Can someone put the FPC tags in for me on the image page? Everytime I try to go to the page, it automaticlly logs me out for some reason. --293.xx.xxx.xx 06:26, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I agree we need some more car FPs however this is not quite the quality I think is needed. blown highlighs. Very grainy (high res scan of a small film picture?). and not as crisp as one would like. good composition though. -Fcb981 06:41, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all above. Focus and lighting issues all over. --Bridgecross 14:31, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Terrible composition and lighting. Its grainy and theres the back of another car which can be seen on the left side of the picture. Looks like a car show picture. --Midnight Rider 20:20, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose hate the composition, hate the lighting, grainy, too much glare off of the car. ALKIVAR™ ☢ 06:42, 25 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Car is ugly too. ~ trialsanderrors 10:31, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Whether or not you think the car is ugly is irrelevant. I think spiders are ugly, should we not have any featured pictures of them? Joe D 20:37, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
  - That was a "per everybody above" oppose, in case that isn't clear. ~ trialsanderrors 05:00, 27 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose- Blurry. Jorcoga ^Hi!_{02:29, Saturday, January 27 2007}
Oppose Lighting issues. S h a r k f a c e 2 1 7 03:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted --KFP (talk | contribs) 14:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]