Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/File:Worcester Cathedral Cloister, Worcestershire, UK - Diliff.jpg
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 30 Jul 2014 at 13:53:50 (UTC)
- Reason
- It's an interesting view of the cloister of Worcester Cathedral. As HDR tone mapping was used (and is used in virtually all my interiors), some detail of the cathedral is visible through the glass windows. This would normally be washed out (and probably the shadow detail would also be lost, as it's an extremely contrasty scene). In the foreground on the left is (I believe) an old radiator used to keep the cloister heated in winter.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Worcester Cathedral
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors
- Creator
- User:Diliff
- Support as nominator – Ðiliff «» (Talk) 13:53, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support –--Hafspajen (talk) 14:00, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Coat of Many Colours (talk) 14:52, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support – Interesting perspective. The detail of the floor, the windows, and the ceiling is amazing. CorinneSD (talk) 21:21, 20 July 2014 (UTC)
- Comment - nice picture but the far right window makes the ceiling above it look steamy (I know it's the sun's glare). ///EuroCarGT 04:23, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- Question - Why not go with a set? The images you got were stunning... I'm just not sure if the cloisters on their own have the EV to pass the featured bar. Don't see much detail on the cloisters in the article. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 11:19, 21 July 2014 (UTC)
- True. I did consider sets but it's a lot of photos and I didn't want to overwhelm. There could easily be 10-20 sets of 5+ photos by the time I'm done. But I suppose you're right, it may be better than lower EV individual images. Part of the problem is that we need more cathedral article contributors. It's too much for me to sufficiently expand that many articles. I'm just a photo guy. ;-) I'm happy to withdraw the nom and renominate the set though. Thoughts, anyone? Ðiliff «» (Talk) 19:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Well, based on the response here I think it's obvious my concerns are not shared by other reviewers. No worries. (BTW, Support on technical quality; we can find some more information on the cloisters later) — Crisco 1492 (talk) 00:48, 23 July 2014 (UTC)
- True. I did consider sets but it's a lot of photos and I didn't want to overwhelm. There could easily be 10-20 sets of 5+ photos by the time I'm done. But I suppose you're right, it may be better than lower EV individual images. Part of the problem is that we need more cathedral article contributors. It's too much for me to sufficiently expand that many articles. I'm just a photo guy. ;-) I'm happy to withdraw the nom and renominate the set though. Thoughts, anyone? Ðiliff «» (Talk) 19:11, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
- Support - Great detail and perspective.--Godot13 (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
Promoted File:Worcester Cathedral Cloister, Worcestershire, UK - Diliff.jpg --Armbrust The Homunculus 13:54, 30 July 2014 (UTC)
