Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/James Lovelock
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 1 Jun 2011 at 13:18:42 (UTC)
- Reason
- Stumbled across this image today and found it very engaging. A genuinely globally notable figure – whatever you make of the Gaia hypothesis, etc – in a very natural and warm portrait. IMO technicals are good enough.
- Articles in which this image appears
- James Lovelock
Gaia hypothesis
Fonseca Prize - FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Others
- Creator
- Bruno Comby of Association of Environmentalists For Nuclear Energy
- Support as nominator --jjron (talk) 13:18, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
- Weak oppose. Sorry, but our standards for portraits is quite high. I can understand all the plants around him that would normally be considered clutter (but here presents him in nature); however, the flash in the glasses is distracting. Sharpness is OK, not bad for a compact. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per King of Hearts
+ the statue is distracting. Tomer T (talk) 05:41, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- <facepalm> The statue is evidently Gaia, which, um, is kinda there for a reason methinks. --jjron (talk) 06:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- You're right. I changed my comment. Tomer T (talk) 09:56, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- <facepalm> The statue is evidently Gaia, which, um, is kinda there for a reason methinks. --jjron (talk) 06:53, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
- Support Though this is technically imperfect, it fits the man well. Cowtowner (talk) 03:36, 25 May 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose -- it's nice to see something different, but ultimately the flash reflections in his glasses and the lack of sharpness of the subject lead me to oppose this. NotFromUtrecht (talk) 21:27, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Makeemlighter (talk) 20:58, 1 June 2011 (UTC)