Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 15 Aug 2022 at 17:34:37 (UTC)

Original – Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto, a 1597–1600 painting by Caravaggio

Reason: High resolution
Articles in which this image appears: Jupiter, Neptune and Pluto, 1597 in art, List of paintings by Caravaggio
FP category for this image: Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
Creator: Caravaggio

Support as nominator – TheFreeWorld (talk) 17:34, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
This looks a bit different and mirror-image the copy on the museum site, and also seems scaled up a bit. It's a great painting, though. Especially Cerberus. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 10:17, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
They are not the same image. There is also no source for this FPC on the file page, only the other - which apparently is just an on-line "museum" by two individuals. This image is marked "self-scanned", whatever that means - printed source, perhaps? Interestingly, the largest version is found (TinEye) on a stock photo site, asking for payment for a PD image... Withholding judgement because of all this. --Janke | Talk 18:39, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, that's the source given for this. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8% of all FPs} 20:05, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There are two photos of this painting here and here. They clearly show the nom image is a flipped version of the original. About copyright, correct me if I am wrong, I don't think any photo of such an old painting can be copyrighted. Bammesk (talk) 02:33, 12 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well, this is an odd case: It's on an arched roof as far as I'm aware, so it's not a flat 2D work. It's not much more than one, though, so you could probably argue it's not enough to get photo copyright. Adam Cuerden ^(talk)_{Has about 8.1% of all FPs} 00:27, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Not Promoted --Armbrust ^{The Homunculus} 18:01, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]