Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Kronoberg Castle
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 22 Jan 2013 at 17:12:12 (UTC)
- Reason
- Good quality and high EV
- Articles in which this image appears
- Kronoberg Castle
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
- Creator
- LC-de
- Support as nominator --Tomer T (talk) 17:12, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not inspired by this and I don't find it as informative as something like http://mw2.google.com/mw-panoramio/photos/medium/63062094.jpg which allows the viewer to see the overall shape of the castle. In the photo we have it looks like a wall with nothing behind. :( Matthewedwards (talk · contribs) 20:18, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support I like the composition and also the perspective that allows the surrounding water to be seen along with the bridge leading to the castle. As two of the towers are clearly visible at the corners, it should be obvious that this more than just a wall. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:31, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support per nom and AFBorchert... I was going to make it weak as the surrounding scenery and grass is very dark and blurred, but the focus of the nom ie the castle, is fine... gazhiley 12:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- neutral the composition is interesting however the colours are over staturated (or very nikonish) especially the sky.--PierreSelim (talk) 23:37, 15 January 2013 (UTC)
- Oppose Even if the sky color weren't so uneven, the clouds are too much of a distraction from the castle. Daniel Case (talk) 17:58, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Support per Gazhiley. Adam Cuerden (talk) 20:17, 17 January 2013 (UTC)
- Weak oppose not to bad, but I also find the sky distracting from the actual subject, in part because of the framing. --ELEKHHT 00:46, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 17:26, 22 January 2013 (UTC)