Wikipedia

Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Map of Goa

< Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates

Map of Goa

edit
 
Map of the talukas (divisions) of Goa

--Self nom:

Since there's a map already in FPC, I thought I'd try my luck. Purple shades are North Goa district, and orange are South Goa. This is my first nomination here.

  • Nominate and support. - =Nichalp «Talk»= 12:53, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • I don't really like the idea of maps on FPC, but it is a nice one. Phoenix2 16:47, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • Nothing at all wrong with maps on FPC, though I would strongly prefer higher resolution. Also seems a bit too tightly cropped on the right and bottom. —Cryptic (talk) 17:21, 12 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • I can rectify this; the original resolution of the map is pretty decent. How large a size is acceptable? (I have BW constraints though, so will avoid too many kilobytes on myside) =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:18, July 12, 2005 (UTC)
  • Looks greatly improved from the original. The only thing I would consider adding is a scale key. Kaldari 05:37, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any suggestions please list it below. I'll implement all the suggestions in bulk a day or two before voting ends instead of uploading repeatedly after every suggestion. I hope nobody has any objection to this? Thanks =Nichalp «Talk»= 06:53, July 15, 2005 (UTC)

  • Support -- Sundar \talk \contribs 12:21, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support good enough. --Shivu 12:46, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - pretty good and informative, particularly if issues raised above are resolved.--Bhadani 15:32, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment. It might sound strange, but I think it would look much better if "GOA" were not underlined; this is mainly because the line starts very far form the points of the "G" curve straight above it, but stops exactly under "A"; it gives a sense of imbalance, particularly for such a short word. My wording is clumsy, I know, but I'm sure you understand what I mean. Phils 16:49, 15 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Understood loud and clear. If there are no objections, I'll modify that. =Nichalp «Talk»= 17:25, July 15, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment. I don't know, but the mix of serif and non-serif fonts is unusual. Also, the colour palette is a little subdued. Enochlau 03:20, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • So that would mean that I would have to increase the saturation a bit. =Nichalp «Talk»= 05:40, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
      • It's just all purples and yellows/browns at the moment... doesn't look that nice... Enochlau 13:52, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
        • But the similar shades represent a district. =Nichalp «Talk»= 14:31, July 16, 2005 (UTC)
          • Now that you've explained it to me that makes a lot more sense. But is it obvious? Perhaps something else (e.g. changing the colour of words, emphasising some borders, etc.. to better delineate north and south? Enochlau 02:35, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
            • Thanks for your suggestions. I can mark the divisions in another shade, but in some areas the two are separated by rivers and by colouring them, the rivers will get hidden. Aren't the words: North Goa and South Goa spread across the divisions sufficient? =Nichalp «Talk»= 09:12, July 17, 2005 (UTC)
  • Comment, if this is a scale map, it should probably have a scale.--nixie 08:48, 16 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Update2: Added scale, removed the underline. =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:08, July 16, 2005 (UTC)

  • Support. —Cryptic (talk) 06:33, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support. Assuming the arrow is indicating north, I would also consider moving it to the top right or bottom right (perhaps as a simple compass symbol such as this). At the moment, it looks a little like it is indicating that Goa is somewhere further up the page. -- Solipsist 14:06, 17 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Would you mind uploading the source files (illustrator, photoshop, whatever) that you used to create the image? That way people can edit it in accordance with GFDL in the future. — David Remahl 06:21, 19 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • My bandwidth is limited unfortunately, and its a whopping 20mb for me. I also believe commons doesn't support these files as of now. The moment I get access to unlimited BW, I'll upload the source file. =Nichalp «Talk»= 19:03, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
      • I checked the size. The image size says its 17.3/126.3 M. 127MB is a bit too large for me. BTW: The original image resolution is 2190 x 2756. =Nichalp «Talk»= 18:53, July 20, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 15:10, 21 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
  • Neutral. clorful and shows the subdivisions, but maybe more villages and cities should be shown. — Stevey7788 (talk) 21:08, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
    • That would make it too cramped. Besides, the map shows the most populated towns and the taluka HQ which constitute 50% of the urban populace. =Nichalp «Talk»= 15:08, July 25, 2005 (UTC)
  • ( − ) Oppose looks OK, but I've never been one for maps --Fir0002 10:11, July 23, 2005 (UTC)
  • Support - Impressed by the process of improvement demonstrated above through constructive criticism from wikipedians and the willingness of the creator to listen and respond. We ended up with a very nice map. Oska 11:43, July 27, 2005 (UTC)
  • Oppose--ScottyBoy900Q∞ 20:17, 27 July 2004 (UTC)[reply]
    • You'd have to state a reason why you oppose, so that I can take care of it. =Nichalp «Talk»= 07:50, July 28, 2005 (UTC)

Promoted Image:Goamap.png +9 / -2 / 1 neutral -- Solipsist 19:30, 28 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Featured_picture_candidates/Map_of_Goa&oldid=1136093189"