Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Our Rose
- Nominate and support. - Very Beautiful image that my sister took from our garden. Person22 08:17, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment, I'm going to have to make a template for my rantings. Say again, which article does this pretty pic significantly contribute to? --Dschwen 08:51, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Since the 2day comment period got silently killed off I might as well oppose right now. --Dschwen 22:24, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose As far as I can see, no articles use that image. A criteria is that it adds to an article. Besides, there's many beautiful flower pictures, which is not FP. See Nightshade-article for one. --Vidarlo 20:37, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - sorry, featured pics must contribute significantly to an article. Flcelloguy (A note?) 21:27, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose As in life, beauty itself is not enough. This image is nothing special in the rose photo department. Denni ☯ 02:37, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose It is meaningless without the cultivar name, and is also missing its edges - MPF 16:13, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Oppose Not clear, cropped awkwardly, poor lighting.. If there's a non-cropped version of the photo, upload it and let someone edit it.. drumguy8800 - speak? 04:19, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
Support Beautiful image --Fir0002 05:24, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment, it is a fine image, but it is not linked in any article. It is a criteria that it adds significantly to the article. It is not a criteria that it is a beutiful image. --Vidarlo 12:52, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
- Then link it! --Kilo-Lima 13:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: First, I think this is wrong attitude. One should find a article the image adds to before proposing it as a FP. Second, I can't really think of any articles that'd be significantly improved by this image, at least until we get the species of the plant, and so. There is images of roses out there, better than this. Look in the Rose article. See no need for more images. And those who are there, are better than this So no, don't link it. I'd say delete it. --Vidarlo 21:01, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Agree with User:Denni. enochlau (talk) 08:48, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose In terms of beauty, I like more this cc-by rose. --Wikimol 22:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose. Not bad, but it isn't used in any articles. Camerafiend 03:32, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
- User:Kilo-Lima/Support Simple. --Kilo-Lima 13:48, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Oppose - YAFP (flower post) --Deglr6328 08:00, 3 January 2006 (UTC)
Not promoted Raven4x4x 05:54, 4 January 2006 (UTC)