Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Pacific

Support — Tomer T 17:22, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose: Lacks enough interesting features, blown out highlights, artifacts visible in full-size, definite chromatic abberations visible. -- KirinX 17:30, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Support Very interesting, disagree with KirinX. BlackBear 19:52, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. Mood-shot, low enc. Fuzzy and noisy. --Dschwen 21:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per above. Not encyclopedic, could really be any beach in the world.--Uberlemur 22:03, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per all above.--Here T oHelp 01:12, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Nice composition and colouring but poor photographic quality. Horizon is tilted. 217.129.91.43 08:05, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not sufficiently striking for FP - Adrian Pingstone 15:09, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose Not really notable. Gaius Cornelius 23:34, 28 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not promoted MER-C 09:27, 3 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]